· Private foundation
Arkansas Community Health & Education Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of ARKANSAS COMMUNITY HEALTH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHI ST VINCENT FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UAMS FOUNDATION | $99,900 |
| ARKANSAS ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION | $35,000 |
| DUNBAR COMMUNITY GARDEN | $14,320 |
| SYNERGY SATURDAY | $12,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $10,316 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| THE VAN LITTLE ROCK | $5,000 |
| IMMERSE ARKANSAS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| LITTLE ROCK COMPASSION CENTER | $5,000 |
| ARKANSAS FOODBANK | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $147k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IAIMMERSE ARKANSAS5× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +337%
- DCDUNBAR COMMUNITY GARDEN7× · 2019–2025 · $74k · revenue +24% · 31% of their budget
- AFARKANSAS FOODBANK7× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +106%
Funded once
- FBFOOD BANK OF ARKANSASone grant, 2020 · $60k
- OMOZARK MISSION PROJECT INCone grant, 2024 · $55k · revenue 0%
- WSWORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLINDone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities
Teaching work skills and daily living skills to individuals with developmental disabilities.
To provide services to low income individuals.
To enhance the quality of life for those facing serious illness and loss by surrounding them with love and embracing them with the best in physical, emotional and spiritual care programs and services, and to help donors meet their…
To provide legal assistance & housing counseling to the underprivileged citizens of north arkansas.
We create a compassionate, welcoming and restorative community for family caregivers across the state who are caring for those with dementia, chronic illness, or debilitating disease.
To vigorously advocate for and enforce the legal rights of people with disabilities in arkansas.
To improve education youth development health and wellness in African American communities throughout the State of Arkansas
The mission of east arkansas youth services, inc. is to provide a comprehensive continuum of care to include therapeutic, educational, and advocacy services, to youth and their families, and to instill motivation and courage to empower…
To provide comprehensive and coordinated programs for the elderly in counties of arkansas and oklahoma.
The organization provides a therapeutic shelter and care for homeless and/or abused children.
To nourish northwest arkansas communities by feeding hungry people through partnerships with other hunger relief organizations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Philander Smith College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IMMERSE ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds DUNBAR COMMUNITY GARDEN ↗
- Who funds OZARK MISSION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds EASTERSEALS ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds Philander Smith College ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S PROTECTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds GOODNESS VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds BETTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds PARK Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds GAINES HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Arvest Foundation · Heart of Arkansas United Way · Riggs Benevolent Fund · The Methodist Foundation for Arkansas · Brown Foundation · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Lpr Foundation · Roy & Christine Sturgis Charitable & Educational Trust · Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas Inc · The Hussman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arkansas Community Health & Education Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arkansas Community Health & Education Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Arkansas Community Health & Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.