Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arkansas Community Health & Education Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$307k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$855kEducation$305kFood & Nutrition$204kHuman Services$178kYouth Development$172kHousing & Shelter$96kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kEnvironment$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHI ST VINCENT FOUNDATION$100,000
UAMS FOUNDATION$99,900
ARKANSAS ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION$35,000
DUNBAR COMMUNITY GARDEN$14,320
SYNERGY SATURDAY$12,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,316
LITTLE ROCK COMPASSION CENTER$5,000
ARKANSAS FOODBANK$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE VAN LITTLE ROCK$5,000
IMMERSE ARKANSAS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%GAINES HOUSE: $10k → 17%PAR K FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%PAR K FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%PAR K FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%LIFE QUEST OF ARKANSAS: $11k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 17%IMMERSE ARKANSAS: $27k → 17%CENTERS FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES: $20k → 17%IMMERSE ARKANSAS: $10k → 17%IMMERSE ARKANSAS: $5k → 17%IMMERSE ARKANSAS: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 19 repeat orgs$758k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
30

Total granted

$1.2M
$611k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+10%

Still filing today

32%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $147k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IA
    IMMERSE ARKANSAS
    5× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +337%
  • DC
    DUNBAR COMMUNITY GARDEN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $74k · revenue +24% · 31% of their budget
  • AF
    ARKANSAS FOODBANK
    7× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF ARKANSAS
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • OM
    OZARK MISSION PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $55k · revenue +4%
  • WS
    WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
2
Arkansas Enterprises for the Developmentally Disabled Inc

Teaching work skills and daily living skills to individuals with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
3
Central Arkansas Development Council

To provide services to low income individuals.

Community Improvement
4
Arkansas Hospice Inc

To enhance the quality of life for those facing serious illness and loss by surrounding them with love and embracing them with the best in physical, emotional and spiritual care programs and services, and to help donors meet their…

Human Services
5
Legal Aid of Arkansas

To provide legal assistance & housing counseling to the underprivileged citizens of north arkansas.

Crime & Legal
6
Alzheimer's Arkansas Programs & Services

We create a compassionate, welcoming and restorative community for family caregivers across the state who are caring for those with dementia, chronic illness, or debilitating disease.

Health
7
Disability Rights Arkansas Inc

To vigorously advocate for and enforce the legal rights of people with disabilities in arkansas.

Civil Rights
8
Urban League of the State of Arkansas Inc

To improve education youth development health and wellness in African American communities throughout the State of Arkansas

—
9
East Arkansas Youth Services Inc

The mission of east arkansas youth services, inc. is to provide a comprehensive continuum of care to include therapeutic, educational, and advocacy services, to youth and their families, and to instill motivation and courage to empower…

Human Services
10
Area Agency On Aging of Western Arkansas

To provide comprehensive and coordinated programs for the elderly in counties of arkansas and oklahoma.

Human Services
11
Arkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc

The organization provides a therapeutic shelter and care for homeless and/or abused children.

Housing & Shelter
12
Northwest Arkansas Food Bank

To nourish northwest arkansas communities by feeding hungry people through partnerships with other hunger relief organizations.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Philander Smith College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHI-ST VINCENT FOUNDATION: $562,686 · OtherCHI-ST VINCENT FOUNDATIONSALVATION ARMY OF LITTLE ROCK: $75,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF LITTLE ROCKFOOD BANK OF ARKANSAS: $60,000 · OtherUALR FOUNDATION: $56,000 · Other+33 more: $546,606 · Other+33 moreUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $99,900 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…DUNBAR COMMUNITY GARDEN: $74,320 · EducationDUNBAR COMMUN…Philander Smith College: $40,000 · EducationPhilander Smi…ARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $20,000 · EducationARKANSAS IMAG…IMMERSE ARKANSAS: $97,268 · Human ServicesIMMERSE ARK…WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $50,000 · Human ServicesWORLD SERVI…CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR…PARK Foundation Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesPARK Founda…LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $11,000 · Human ServicesLIFEQUEST O…GAINES HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $40,000 · HealthGOODNESS VILLAGE: $27,134 · HealthOZARK MISSION PROJECT INC: $54,832 · Housing & ShelterARKANSAS FOODBANK: $37,000 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S PROTECTION CENTER: $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,300,292Education$234,220Human Services$203,268Health$67,134Housing & Shelter$54,832Food & Nutrition$37,000Crime & Legal$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $99,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIMMERSE ARKANSAS: $97,268 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetDUNBAR COMMUNITY GARDEN: $74,320 over 7y, 31% of budgetOZARK MISSION PROJECT INC: $54,832 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetWORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPhilander Smith College: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $37,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S PROTECTION CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetGOODNESS VILLAGE: $27,134 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBETTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $20,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARK Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGAINES HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN VILLAGE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNAMI - ARKANSAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMERSE ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds DUNBAR COMMUNITY GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds OZARK MISSION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds Philander Smith College ↗
  • Who funds EASTERSEALS ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S PROTECTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GOODNESS VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds BETTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds GAINES HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR31× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Arvest Foundation · Heart of Arkansas United Way · Riggs Benevolent Fund · The Methodist Foundation for Arkansas · Brown Foundation · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Lpr Foundation · Roy & Christine Sturgis Charitable & Educational Trust · Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas Inc · The Hussman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arkansas Community Health & Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arkansas Community Health & Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arkansas Community Health & Education Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Arkansas Community Health & Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arkansas Community Health & Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph