Skip to content
Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Provide help to domestic violence victims and encourage community efforts to promote domestic peace.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$364k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Human Services$5.2MCrime & Legal$602kHealth$353kHousing & Shelter$305kArts & Culture$161k
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 28 grants below total $2,631,389, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,703,403 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $72,014 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $227k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $364k
$82,486
Median grant
1
States reached
$838k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER$363,893
SALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC$219,046
FAMILY CRISIS CENTER$217,641
OPTIONS INC$141,314
RESTORATION OF HOPE$130,587
RIVER VALLEY SHELTER FOR WOMEN$114,925
FAMILIES IN TRANSITION$112,759
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS WOMEN'S SHELTER$102,934
CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER$97,238
SANCTUARY INC$94,572
WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST$89,053
MARGIE'S HAVEN HOUSE$83,678
FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION & RAPE CRISIS$82,683
RISE HOUSE ARKANSAS$82,486
WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER OF SO AR$75,927
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $20k → 19%LONOKE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN: $125k → 12%SANCTUARY INC: $95k → 13%THE SAFE PLACE: $48k → 18%RESTORATION OF HOPE: $131k → 19%STONE COUNTY ABUSE PREVENTION: $26k → 20%WHITE RIVER BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $49k → 25%THE FAMILY CENTER INC: $72k → 35%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $15k → 19%LONOKE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN: $85k → 12%SANCTUARY INC: $76k → 13%THE SAFE PLACE: $41k → 18%RESTORATION OF HOPE: $119k → 19%STONE COUNTY ABUSE PREVENTION: $20k → 20%WHITE RIVER BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $48k → 25%THE FAMILY CENTER INC: $71k → 35%LONOKE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN: $58k → 12%SANCTUARY INC: $37k → 13%RESTORATION OF HOPE: $85k → 19%THE FAMILY CENTER INC: $70k → 35%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 29 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
0

Total granted

$6.6M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $464k · revenue +11%
  • SC
    SALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $385k · revenue +55%
  • RO
    RESTORATION OF HOPE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $335k · revenue +3% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

    Rape crisis and abuse shelter

    —
    2
    Crisis Intervention Shelter Service

    Assistance to victims of violence.provide women & children salfe shelter, support groups, advocacy, referrals, financial assistance, hotline.

    Human Services
    3
    Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

    Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

    Human Services
    4
    Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

    Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

    —
    5
    Safe Haven Inc

    As an advocate for women and children of domestic violence and sexual assault, safe haven inc. strives to provide emergency shelter and crisis intervention in a loving, caring and secure environment that will uphold their dignity and…

    —
    6
    Domestic Abuse Support Center of Shawano County Inc
    Housing & Shelter
    7
    Crisis Control Center

    Provide on-going support services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. support includes a safe house & 24 hour phone line.

    Human Services
    8
    Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

    Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

    —
    9
    Homesafe Inc

    To provide shelter and support to victims of domestic violence and rape

    Health
    10
    Hope House of Scott County

    Domestic violence shelter and services for victims and their families

    Human Services
    11
    S a F E Shelter

    We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

    —
    12
    Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

    Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Violence Prevention Inc; the most unlike its peers is Families in Transition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    29/29
    Grantees still filing
    20/29
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $463,645 · Human ServicesFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INCOPTIONS INC: $342,878 · Human ServicesOPTIONS INCRESTORATION OF HOPE INC: $334,607 · Human ServicesRESTORATION OF HOPE INCNORTHWEST ARKANSAS WOMEN'S SHELTER: $329,068 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ARKANSAS WOMEN'S SHELTERRIVER VALLEY SHELTER FOR BATTERED WOMEN AND CHILDR: $305,641 · Human ServicesRIVER VALLEY SHELTER FOR BATTERED WOMEN AND CHILDRFAMILIES IN TRANSITION: $280,851 · Human ServicesFAMILIES IN TRANSITIONLONOKE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC: $268,359 · Human ServicesLONOKE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INCFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $235,474 · Human ServicesFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION INCTHE HAVEN OF NORTHEAST ARKANSAS INC: $228,964 · Human ServicesWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $228,687 · Human ServicesRISE HOUSE ARKANSAS: $228,036 · Human ServicesFAMILY CENTER INC: $212,574 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY INC: $207,731 · Human ServicesWHITE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $184,239 · Human Services+6 more: $498,646 · Human Services+6 morePEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC: $677,981 · OtherPEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTE…CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $309,013 · OtherCRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER …TURNING POINT OF SOUTH ARKANSAS INC: $223,043 · OtherTURNING POINT OF SOUTH ARKA…WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $221,860 · OtherWOMEN'S CRISIS CENTERMARGIE'S HAVEN HOUSE INC: $127,606 · OtherMARGIE'S HAVEN HOUSE INCSERENITY INC: $77,374 · OtherSALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC: $384,769 · Crime & LegalSECOND CHANCE DV SA SHELTER: $160,555 · Arts & CultureOUACHITA CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $97,146 · Housing & Shelter
    Human Services$4,349,400Other$1,636,877Crime & Legal$384,769Arts & Culture$160,555Housing & Shelter$97,146

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC: $677,981 over 3y, 14% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $463,645 over 3y, 18% of budgetSALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC: $384,769 over 3y, 21% of budgetOPTIONS INC: $342,878 over 3y, 19% of budgetRESTORATION OF HOPE INC: $334,607 over 3y, 40% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS WOMEN'S SHELTER: $329,068 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetCRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $309,013 over 3y, 10% of budgetRIVER VALLEY SHELTER FOR BATTERED WOMEN AND CHILDR: $305,641 over 3y, 19% of budgetFAMILIES IN TRANSITION: $280,851 over 3y, 15% of budgetLONOKE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC: $268,359 over 3y, 13% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $235,474 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetTHE HAVEN OF NORTHEAST ARKANSAS INC: $228,964 over 3y, 18% of budgetWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $228,687 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetRISE HOUSE ARKANSAS: $228,036 over 3y, 14% of budgetTURNING POINT OF SOUTH ARKANSAS INC: $223,043 over 3y, 15% of budgetWOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $221,860 over 3y, 16% of budgetFAMILY CENTER INC: $212,574 over 3y, 27% of budgetSANCTUARY INC: $207,731 over 3y, 21% of budgetWHITE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $184,239 over 3y, 10% of budgetSECOND CHANCE DV SA SHELTER: $160,555 over 3y, 15% of budgetCOMPASSIONS FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $129,924 over 3y, 14% of budgetMARGIE'S HAVEN HOUSE INC: $127,606 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetCOMMITTEE AGAINST SPOUSE ABUSE INC: $100,352 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetOUACHITA CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $97,146 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSERENITY INC: $77,374 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetSTONE COUNTY ABUSE PREVENTION INC: $46,272 over 2y, 11% of budgetDomestic Violence Prevention Inc: $35,374 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Arkansas Coalition Ag…Arkansas Community Fo…Mary Kay Ash Foundati…Arvest FoundationZumiez FoundationEdward Jones Foundati…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
    Arkansas Coalition Against Sexual AssaultAR28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 6 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Arkansas Coalition Against Sexual Assault · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Zumiez Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Bigger dots raise more.

    2023
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home