· Public charity
Arkansas Coalition Against Sexual Assault
To serve as a collective voice to eliminate all forms of sexual violence and advocate for the rights and needs of individuals affected by sexual assault through program support, education, and social change.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of ARKANSAS COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $81k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+2 grants · $582k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OZARK RAPE CRISIS CENTER | $309,103 |
| CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC | $272,402 |
| NWA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER | $200,931 |
| FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION | $195,844 |
| LONOKE CO SAFE HAVEN | $187,405 |
| WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER OF S AR | $158,966 |
| FAMILIES IN TRANSITION | $145,454 |
| FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC | $124,770 |
| SALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN | $106,514 |
| WHITE CO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENT | $80,979 |
| OPTIONS INC | $74,019 |
| WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST | $51,918 |
| SW ARKANSAS CRISIS & RESOURCE CENTE | $41,062 |
| RISE HOUSE CONWAY | $39,541 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OROZARK RAPE CRISIS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +165% · 41% of their budget
- CICRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $983k · revenue +39%
- WCWOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER7× · 2019–2025 · $552k · revenue +83% · 33% of their budget
Funded once
- WCWOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER OF SOUTH ARone grant, 2018 · $43k
- CACOMMITTEE AGAINST SPOUSE ABUSE INCone grant, 2023 · $37k · revenue -19%
- DVDomestic Violence Prevention Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rape crisis and abuse shelter
Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.
Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.
Assistance to victims of violence.provide women & children salfe shelter, support groups, advocacy, referrals, financial assistance, hotline.
Help abused & battered woman
Provide on-going support services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. support includes a safe house & 24 hour phone line.
This center brings victims of domestic violence and sexual assault together to provide a safe and nurturing place to learn and grow through crisis and case management, court advocacy, support groups and 24 hour crisis hotline.
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt
Eliminating domestic violence and sexual abuse in our society.
Prevention of domestic violence
Support services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault & other crimes. we serve city and rural populations - men - women & children.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Intervention Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Families in Transition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OZARK RAPE CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES IN TRANSITION ↗
- Who funds WHITE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds OPTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS RAPE CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE AGAINST SPOUSE ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Domestic Violence Prevention Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arkansas Coalition Against Sexual Assault funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.