Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Arkansas Cancer Coalition

The coalition is a partnership of individuals and organizations working together to (1) provide an overview of the current status of cancer control in arkansas, (2) reduce the overall burden of cancer by providing and maintaining a plan of goals and strategies, and (3) improve the quality of life for those personally affected by cancer…

$738k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$146k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$2.3MEducation$320kHousing & Shelter$219kHuman Services$136kCommunity Improvement$125kYouth Development$45kCivil Rights$41kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $353k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $380k
$36,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$638k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$145,625
EAST AR ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY SMALL$124,608
ARKANSAS IMMUNIZATION ACTION COALIT$55,000
MAINLINE HEALTH SYSTEM INC$55,000
JEFFERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$49,190
DONALD W REYNOLDS CANCER SUPPORT H$49,138
GOODNESS VILLAGE$44,600
HOME FOR HEALING$36,000
CARTI FOUNDATION$32,532
UAMS$31,223
UNIVERSITY DISTRICT DEVLOPMENT CORP$25,000
HUGHES AR FOOD PANTRY$25,000
CITY OF FORREST CITY AR$25,000
CENTRAL AR SPHINX FOUNDATION - GARD$20,000
PINK RUBIES IN THE DELTA$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%WELLS BAYOU YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $45k → 25%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 15 repeat orgs$599k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$2.9M
$365k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+13%

Still filing today

67%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    ST BERNARDS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $343k · revenue +7%
  • AI
    Arkansas Immunization Action Coalition
    7× · 2018–2025 · $329k · revenue +104%
  • MH
    MAINLINE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $275k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • DW
    DONALD W REYNOLDS CANCER SUPPORT H
    one grant, 2017 · $55k
  • CS
    CHI ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS (FKA MERCY HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS)
    one grant, 2021 · $51k · revenue +13%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS HOUSE NWA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $51k · revenue +134%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
2
St Vincent Medical Group

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
3
Arkansas Hospice Inc

To enhance the quality of life for those facing serious illness and loss by surrounding them with love and embracing them with the best in physical, emotional and spiritual care programs and services, and to help donors meet their…

Human Services
4
Jefferson Hospital Association Inc

Jefferson regional's mission is improving health through excellence and compassion with a vision to be the healthcare provider and employer of choice for southeast arkansas.

Health
5
Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association

Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
North Arkansas Regional Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing quality services that are comprehensive and affordable. we expect services to be delivered compassionately, appropriately, responsibly, safely and efficiently.

Health
7
Sarh Holdings Inc

The mission of sarh is to improve the health and healing of the people of south arkansas, and its vision is to be the regional health care provider of choice through the values of "we care": welcoming, excellence, compassion, adaptability,…

Health
8
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
9
Chi St Vincent Medical Group Hot Springs Fka Mercy Clinic Hot Springs Communities

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we service, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

10
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
11
Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center

Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
12
Conway Cancer Foundation

The mission of conway cancer foundation is to provide education and support for cancer patients and their families.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Support Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wells Bayou Youth Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST BERNARDS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $342,799 · OtherST BERNARDS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIONUAMS — $319,933 · OtherUAMSIndividual grant recipient — $255,625 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCANCER SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $182,455 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT FOUNDATIONEAST AR ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY SMALL — $124,608 · OtherEAST AR ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY SMALLMAINLINE HEALTH SYSTEM — $108,952 · OtherMAINLINE HEALTH SYSTEMJEFFERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $104,190 · OtherJEFFERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERWHITE RIVER RURAL HEATLH CENTER — $88,073 · Other+9 more — $303,269 · Other+9 moreArkansas Immunization Action Coalition — $329,480 · HealthArkansas Immunization Action CoalitionMAINLINE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $275,000 · HealthMAINLINE HEALTH SYSTEMS INCCentral Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute Inc — $217,032 · HealthCentral Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute IncGOODNESS VILLAGE — $194,313 · HealthGOODNESS VILLAGECARTI Foundation Inc — $183,700 · HealthCARTI Foundation IncWashington Regional Medical Center — $108,472 · HealthWashington Regional Medical CenterPARENTS AND FRIENDS OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS — $106,000 · HealthPARENTS AND FRIENDS OF CHILDREN AND ADULTSHope Cancer Resources — $81,249 · Health+2 more — $101,120 · Health+2 moreWells Bayou Youth Development Inc — $45,298 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,829,904Health$1,596,366Human Services$45,298Housing & Shelter$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST BERNARDS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $342,799 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetArkansas Immunization Action Coalition — $329,480 over 7y, 22% of budgetMAINLINE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $275,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute Inc — $217,032 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOODNESS VILLAGE — $194,313 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetCARTI Foundation Inc — $183,700 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $182,455 over 4y, 12% of budgetWashington Regional Medical Center — $108,472 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS AND FRIENDS OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS — $106,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetHope Cancer Resources — $81,249 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCHI ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS (FKA MERCY HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS) — $50,610 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS HOUSE NWA INC — $50,510 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST BERNARDS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Arkansas Immunization Action Coalition
  • Who funds MAINLINE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
  • Who funds Central Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute Inc
  • Who funds GOODNESS VILLAGE
  • Who funds CARTI Foundation Inc
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Washington Regional Medical Center
  • Who funds PARENTS AND FRIENDS OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS
  • Who funds Hope Cancer Resources
  • Who funds CHI ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS (FKA MERCY HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS)
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOUSE NWA INC
  • Who funds Wells Bayou Youth Development Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Delta Dental of Arkansas Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Riggs Benevolent Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arkansas Cancer Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arkansas Cancer Coalition?

    Find your warmest path to Arkansas Cancer Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph