Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arizona Pain Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$301kInternational$176kHuman Services$16kHealth$11kYouth Development$10kRecreation & Sports$3kPhilanthropy$2kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$3,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$161k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES$12,000
GLOBAL INFUSION$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
IN HIS IMAGE$4,500
ASSEMBLIES OF GOD$4,200
SERVING IN MISSION SIM USA$3,600
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$3,096
SUMMIT CHURCH$3,000
WORLD INDIGENOUS MISSIONS$3,000
UNCONDITIONAL LOVE MINISTRIES$3,000
AWAKENING FIRES MINISTRIES$1,800
LACKEY MINISTRIES INC$1,750
YOUNG LIFE$1,200
INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES$1,200
GO FUND ME$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WORLD PIX: $36k → 11%SUMMIT CHURCH: $3k → 10%CHI ALPHA CAMPUS MINISTRIES: $26k → 11%SERVING IN MISSION SIM USA: $4k → 14%UNCONDITIONAL LOVE MINISTRIES: $5k → 5%WORLD INDIGENOUS MISSIONS: $3k → 10%MT28 MINISTRIES: $5k → 10%KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES: $15k → 15%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $5k → 15%GLOBAL INFUSION: $7k → 12%AWAKENING FIRES MINISTRY: $12k → 12%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 9%WORLD PIX: $36k → 11%SERVING IN MISSION SIM USA: $4k → 14%UNCONDITIONAL LOVE MINISTRIES: $3k → 5%KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES: $12k → 15%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $5k → 15%AWAKENING FIRES MINISTRY: $9k → 12%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 9%WORLD PIX: $36k → 11%SIM USA: $4k → 14%UNCONDITIONAL LOVE MINISTRIES: $3k → 5%KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES: $12k → 15%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $5k → 15%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 9%JENNY MCJUNKIN: $10k → 11%SERVING IN MISSION SIM USA: $4k → 14%UNCONDITIONAL LOVE MINISTRIES: $3k → 5%KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES: $12k → 15%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $4k → 15%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 9%ARIZONA MINISTRY NETWORK: $4k → 11%SERVING IN MISSION SIM USA: $4k → 14%UNCONDITIONAL LOVE MINISTRIES: $3k → 5%KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES: $12k → 15%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $4k → 15%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 9%ARIZONA MINISTRY NETWORK: $3k → 11%SERVING IN MISSION SIM USA: $4k → 14%UNCONDITIONAL LOVE MINISTRIES: $3k → 5%KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES: $12k → 15%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $4k → 15%SIM USA: $3k → 14%KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES: $11k → 15%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $4k → 15%SERVING IN MISSION SIM USA: $3k → 14%KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%ANNUAL CHILDREN'S REFUGEE EVENT: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MI
NY
PA
CA
CO
MO
AZ
TN
OK
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Arizona Pain Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Arizona Pain Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$481k · 27 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
30

Total granted

$481k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+44%

Still filing today

48%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KW
    KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +101%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    8× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +16%
  • IO
    INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHI ALPHA CAMPUS MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2018 · $26k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • MI
    MT28 INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
2
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
3
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Global Outreach Mission Inc

Global Outreach Mission, Inc. is an inter-denominational foreign and domestic ministry organization that is engaged in a wide variety of ministries, including church planting, Christian camps, personal work, literature, community…

Religion
6
World Reach Inc

World reach is a global, evangelical missions organization serving fields in east africa, central and south america, europe and the u.s. our purpose is to fulfill the the great commission of jesus christ by reaching the world with the…

Religion
7
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
8
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
9
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
10
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
11
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

12
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Education Equity LeadershipDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Sports Booster Organi…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%45%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IN HIS IMAGE INC — $34,200 · OtherIN HIS IMAGE INCTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD — $33,800 · OtherTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GODUNCONDITIONAL LOVE MINISTRIES — $26,022 · OtherUNCONDITIONAL LOVE MINISTRIESCHI ALPHA CAMPUS MINISTRIES — $25,500 · OtherCHI ALPHA CAMPUS MINISTRIESSERVING IN MISSION SIM USA — $21,300 · OtherSERVING IN MISSION SIM USAAWAKENING FIRES MINISTRY — $21,000 · OtherAWAKENING FIRES MINISTRYLACKEY MINISTRIES INC — $15,000 · OtherLACKEY MINISTRIES INCARIZONA MINISTRY NETWORK — $15,000 · OtherARIZONA MINISTRY NETWORKIndividual grant recipient — $14,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+33 more — $53,074 · Other+33 moreKEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES INC — $96,000 · ReligionKEITH WHEELER MINISTRIE…INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $9,600 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL OUTREACH …MT28 INC — $5,000 · ReligionWorld Indigenous Missions Inc — $4,000 · ReligionWORLD PIX INC — $108,000 · AnimalsWORLD PIX INCCompassion International Incorporated — $24,777 · InternationalGLOBAL INFUSION INC — $7,000 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE — $9,500 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $2,650 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO — $3,250 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $1,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,500 · HealthINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF — $1,000 · HealthTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC — $1,540 · PhilanthropyCHILDRENS OASIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,200 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG — $80 · Education
Other$269,296Religion$114,600Animals$108,000International$31,777Youth Development$12,150Health$7,250Philanthropy$1,540Education$1,280

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLD PIX INC — $108,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetKEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES INC — $96,000 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetIN HIS IMAGE INC — $34,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated — $24,777 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $9,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL INFUSION INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWorld Indigenous Missions Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO — $3,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $2,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC — $1,540 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERGE GLOBAL INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES FOR CHILDREN — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD PIX INC
  • Who funds KEITH WHEELER MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds IN HIS IMAGE INC
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds GLOBAL INFUSION INC
  • Who funds MT28 INC
  • Who funds World Indigenous Missions Inc
  • Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds ANTIOCH NETWORK INC
  • Who funds THE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds CHILDRENS OASIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF
  • Who funds HEROES FOR CHILDREN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arizona Pain Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arizona Pain Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Arizona Pain Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph