Skip to content
Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Inc

To end sexual and domestic violence in Arizona.

$2.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$684k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$14MEducation$1.2MCrime & Legal$1.2MHealth$768kCivil Rights$641kHousing & Shelter$95kReligion$80kArts & Culture$36k
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $2,082,974, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,634,621 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $551,647 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $306k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $808k
  • $250k+2 grants · $938k
$35,495
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tucson Center for Women and Children - EMERGE$684,168
Yavapai Family Advocacy Center$253,483
Against Abuse Inc$245,073
Victim Witness Services of Coconino County$219,702
Northland Family Help Center$133,780
Kingman Aid to Abused People$96,467
HAVEN Family Resource Center$57,153
Legal Services for Crime Victims of Arizona$55,439
Eve's Place KayentaQuartzite$48,149
A New Leaf$45,692
La Frontera Center Inc$35,730
Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc$35,495
Defenders of Children$35,478
Navajo County Family Advocacy Center$17,275
Thrive Center$16,765
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%La Frontera Center Inc: $36k → 15%Kingman Aid to Abused People: $140k → 17%Colorado River Regional Crisis Services: $49k → 20%Kingman Aid to Abused People: $133k → 17%Colorado River Regional Crisis Services: $46k → 20%Victim Witness Services of Coconino County: $220k → 16%Kingman Aid to Abused People: $96k → 17%Victim Witness Services of Coconino County: $23k → 16%Friendly House Family Services: $222k → 11%Tucson Center for Women and Children - EMERGE: $777k → 15%Friendly House: $59k → 11%CCCS Mobile: $75k → 11%CCCS Hotline: $59k → 11%CCCS Mobile: $57k → 11%CCCS Hotline: $41k → 11%Chrysalis: $530k → 11%Chrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence: $80k → 11%Catholic Community Services Inc - My Sisters Place: $7k → 11%Chrysalis: $41k → 11%Chicanos Por La Causa Inc: $381k → 11%Chicanos Por La Causa Inc: $260k → 11%Chicanos Por La Causa: $140k → 11%Chicanos Por La Causa Inc: $30k → 11%New Life Center: $589k → 11%New Life Center: $500k → 11%New Life Center: $224k → 11%New Life Center: $13k → 11%Eve's Place: $1.1M → 11%Jewish Family and Children's Services: $198k → 11%Eve's Place: $1.1M → 11%Doves: $100k → 11%Eve's Place: $666k → 11%Jewish Family and Children's Services: $85k → 11%Eve's Place KayentaQuartzite: $171k → 11%Jewish Family and Children's Services: $40k → 11%Eve's Place KayentaQuartzite: $48k → 11%Defenders of Children: $35k → 11%Shelter Without Walls: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 27 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +0% since the first grant, against -46% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
3

Total granted

$17M
$883k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
-46%

Still filing today

96%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • New Life Center
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +14%
  • SC
    SOJOURNER CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +103%
  • PS
    PEER SOLUTIONS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +30% · 82% of their budget

Funded once

  • TC
    TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $777k · revenue +17%
  • DI
    DOVES INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -46%
  • GH
    GILA HOUSE INC GILA HOUSE GILA SAFE HAVEN ALDERMAN HOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
2
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
3
Northeastern Utah Friends Against Family Violence

Friends Against Family Violence (FAFV) is a community based nonprofit domestic violence program. FAFV provides services, shelter, crisis intervention, and prevention in the Tri-County of Uintah, Duchesne, and Daggett. We provide services…

Health
4
The Center for Women and Children in Crisis

Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
5
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
6
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
7
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
8
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
9
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
10
Women's Center-High Desert Inc

Operates a domestic violence shelter and a rape crisis counseling and assistance team

Human Services
11
Family Crisis Shelter Inc

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse

Human Services
12
Southern Az Childrens Advocacy Ctr Inc

The mission of the chidrens advocacy center of southern arizona is to provide a safe, compassionate, healing environment for children who have been a victim or witnessed a crime. vision: provide each child with the safety they need to tell…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf; the most unlike its peers is Mt Graham Safe House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
16/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVE'S PLACE INC: $3,020,374 · Human ServicesEVE'S PLACE INCAGAINST ABUSE INC: $2,716,324 · Human ServicesAGAINST ABUSE INCNew Life Center: $1,327,407 · Human ServicesNew Life CenterSOJOURNER CENTER: $1,222,244 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER CENTERCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $810,483 · Human ServicesCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLCTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $776,546 · Human ServicesTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABU…Chrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc: $650,624 · Human Services+9 more: $1,787,117 · Human Services+9 moreBLOOM365 INC: $604,994 · Crime & LegalBLOOM365 IN…PREVENT CHILD ABUSE ARIZONA: $356,353 · Crime & LegalPREVENT CHI…Arizona Legal Women and Youth Services: $321,931 · Crime & LegalArizona Leg…NORTHLAND FAMILY HELP CENTER: $220,268 · Crime & LegalNORTHLAND F…Legal Services for Crime Victims in Arizona: $206,704 · Crime & LegalLegal Servi…+1 more: $43,290 · Crime & LegalA NEW LEAF: $971,208 · HealthHAVEN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $220,316 · HealthEMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER: $125,553 · Health+4 more: $72,605 · HealthPEER SOLUTIONS INC: $1,182,797 · EducationLIVE AND LEARN PROGRAM: $628,461 · Youth DevelopmentCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc: $214,225 · OtherFaith and Grace: $79,628 · OtherTHRIVE CENTER INC: $16,765 · OtherTIME OUT INC: $198,670 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING SOLUTIONS OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC: $88,670 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $6,477 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$12,311,119Crime & Legal$1,753,540Health$1,389,682Education$1,182,797Youth Development$628,461Other$310,618Housing & Shelter$293,817

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVE'S PLACE INC: $3,020,374 over 4y, 22% of budgetAGAINST ABUSE INC: $2,716,324 over 3y, 51% of budgetNew Life Center: $1,327,407 over 4y, 13% of budgetSOJOURNER CENTER: $1,222,244 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetPEER SOLUTIONS INC: $1,182,797 over 3y, 82% of budgetA NEW LEAF: $971,208 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $810,483 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $776,546 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetChrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc: $650,624 over 3y, 10% of budgetLIVE AND LEARN PROGRAM: $628,461 over 2y, 35% of budgetBLOOM365 INC: $604,994 over 2y, 34% of budgetKINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $369,530 over 3y, 16% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE ARIZONA: $356,353 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $347,242 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetArizona Legal Women and Youth Services: $321,931 over 3y, 27% of budgetFRIENDLY HOUSE INC: $280,905 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $280,375 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVictim Witness Services For Coconino County: $242,857 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetHAVEN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $220,316 over 3y, 19% of budgetNORTHLAND FAMILY HELP CENTER: $220,268 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc: $214,225 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLegal Services for Crime Victims in Arizona: $206,704 over 3y, 13% of budgetTIME OUT INC: $198,670 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetEMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER: $125,553 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDOVES INCORPORATED: $100,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetCOLORADO RIVER REGIONAL CRISIS SERVICES: $95,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetHOUSING SOLUTIONS OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC: $88,670 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetARIZONA SOUTH ASIANS FOR SAFE FAMILIES: $43,290 over 2y, 24% of budgetLa Frontera Center Inc: $35,730 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChiricahua Community Health Centers Inc: $35,495 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSoutheastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc: $11,782 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMt Graham Safe House Inc: $8,053 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGILA HOUSE INC GILA HOUSE GILA SAFE HAVEN ALDERMAN HOUSE: $6,477 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Arizona Foundation fo…The Diane and Bruce H…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…Virginia G Piper Char…St Mary's Food Bank A…American Express Foun…Thunderbirds CharitiesArizona Foundation fo…Arizona Cardinals Fou…The Foundation for Co…Arizona Food Bank Net…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ50.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · American Express Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Arizona Foundation for Women Inc · Arizona Cardinals Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Arizona Food Bank Network

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home