· Public charity
Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Inc
To end sexual and domestic violence in Arizona.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $2,082,974 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,634,621 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $551,647 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $306k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $808k
- $250k+2 grants · $938k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Tucson Center for Women and Children - EMERGE | $684,168 |
| Yavapai Family Advocacy Center | $253,483 |
| Against Abuse Inc | $245,073 |
| Victim Witness Services of Coconino County | $219,702 |
| Northland Family Help Center | $133,780 |
| Kingman Aid to Abused People | $96,467 |
| HAVEN Family Resource Center | $57,153 |
| Legal Services for Crime Victims of Arizona | $55,439 |
| Eve's Place KayentaQuartzite | $48,149 |
| A New Leaf | $45,692 |
| La Frontera Center Inc | $35,730 |
| Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc | $35,495 |
| Defenders of Children | $35,478 |
| Navajo County Family Advocacy Center | $17,275 |
| Thrive Center | $16,765 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +0% since the first grant, against -46% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
New Life Center4× · 2022–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +14%- SCSOJOURNER CENTER5× · 2021–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +50%
- PSPEER SOLUTIONS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +30% · 82% of their budget
Funded once
- TCTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSEone grant, 2023 · $777k · revenue +17%
- DIDOVES INCORPORATEDone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -46%
- GHGILA HOUSE INC GILA HOUSE GILA SAFE HAVEN ALDERMAN HOUSEone grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -76%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.
Friends Against Family Violence (FAFV) is a community based nonprofit domestic violence program. FAFV provides services, shelter, crisis intervention, and prevention in the Tri-County of Uintah, Duchesne, and Daggett. We provide services…
Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.
We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…
Operates a domestic violence shelter and a rape crisis counseling and assistance team
Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse
The mission of the chidrens advocacy center of southern arizona is to provide a safe, compassionate, healing environment for children who have been a victim or witnessed a crime. vision: provide each child with the safety they need to tell…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf and the most unlike its peers is Mt Graham Safe House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EVE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds AGAINST ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds New Life Center ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEER SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF ↗
- Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
- Who funds TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE ↗
- Who funds Chrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc ↗
- Who funds LIVE AND LEARN PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds BLOOM365 INC ↗
- Who funds KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Arizona Legal Women and Youth Services ↗
- Who funds FRIENDLY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Victim Witness Services For Coconino County ↗
- Who funds HAVEN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHLAND FAMILY HELP CENTER ↗
- Who funds Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc ↗
- Who funds Legal Services for Crime Victims in Arizona ↗
- Who funds TIME OUT INC ↗
- Who funds EMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds DOVES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds COLORADO RIVER REGIONAL CRISIS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA SOUTH ASIANS FOR SAFE FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds La Frontera Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc ↗
- Who funds DEFENDERS OF CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ARIZONA FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Mt Graham Safe House Inc ↗
- Who funds GILA HOUSE INC GILA HOUSE GILA SAFE HAVEN ALDERMAN HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · American Express Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Arizona Foundation for Women Inc · Arizona Cardinals Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Arizona Food Bank Network
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.