· Public charity
Area VII Physicians Review Organization Inc
The purpose of this corporation is to improve the quality of the practice of medicine by developing new methodology and procedures to quantify and qualify projects to improve the quality of medical care, to publish articles related to research and educational efforts related to medical care and the practice of medicine, to maintain a…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $312,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $354,700 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $42,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS | $45,000 |
| LARC SCHOOL IN CONI W COOOER MEDICAL | $35,000 |
| COOPER MEDICAL SCHOOL ROWAN | $25,000 |
| CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CAMDEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| JCC OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY | $17,200 |
| LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES | $15,000 |
| SAMOST JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE | $15,000 |
| RARITAN VALLEY CC FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| NEW HOPE INTEGRATED BEHAVHEALTH CARE | $15,000 |
| ROWAN UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| MERCER STREET FRIENDS | $15,000 |
| CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| KATZ JCC | $10,000 |
| MERCER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $194k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of Area VII Physicians Review Organization Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in NJ; read by stated purpose it is 81% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against -23% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $255k · revenue +35%
- RUROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +37%
- JFJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY8× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- AVAREA VII PHYSICIANS REVIEW ORGANIZATION INCone grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.
The mission of the independent colleges and universities of new jersey, a new jersey non-profit corporation is to advance the interests of new jersey's independent, non-profit, public mission institutions of higher education by promoting…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Larc School Inc D/B/a the Larc Norcross School and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds LARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCARE QUALITY STRATEGIES INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Raritan Valley Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MERCER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds MERCER STREET FRIENDS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AREA VII PHYSICIANS REVIEW ORGANIZATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Oceanfirst Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Central Jersey Family Health Consortium Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Area VII Physicians Review Organization Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Legacy Treatment Services Inc — 2% of income from government
- Larc School Inc D/B/a the Larc Norcross School — 1% of income from government
- Rowan University Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- The College of New Jersey Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Area VII Physicians Review Organization Inc?
Find your warmest path to Area VII Physicians Review Organization Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.