Skip to content
Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc

The area agency on aging, region one is a private non-profit organization that partners with their community to foster innovative programs and services to enrich the quality of life for older adults, caregivers and underserved populations.

$17M
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$72MHealth$27MFood & Nutrition$25MCrime & Legal$19MPublic Benefit$9.5MCommunity Improvement$3.7MYouth Development$1.0MCivil Rights$953kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+17 grants · $15M
$180,861
Median grant
4
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARICOPA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT$2,333,123
ALLTHRIVE 365 FKA FSL PROGRAMS$1,940,952
CITY OF PHOENIX$1,902,983
ATTENTIVE HOME HEALTH$1,259,064
ASTER AGING INC$1,175,842
BENEVILLA$700,285
ALARY'S HOME CARE$635,263
ARIZONA YWCA METROPOLITAN PHOENIX$624,411
LIVE WELL SENIOR CARE LLC$548,512
BANNER HEALTH AN ARIZONA NONPROFIT CORPORATION$547,500
AZCEND$457,716
THE SALVATION ARMY$438,582
CITY OF AVONDALE$420,417
OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC$413,503
AZ SENIOR CITIZEN'S LAW PROJECT INC$379,388
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $38.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BENEVILLA: $1.0M → 11%BENEVILLA: $759k → 11%BENEVILLA: $740k → 11%BENEVILLA: $700k → 11%BENEVILLA: $584k → 11%BENEVILLA: $564k → 11%BENEVILLA: $555k → 11%BENEVILLA: $241k → 11%ASTER AGING INC: $1.2M → 11%ASTER AGING INC: $1.2M → 11%ASTER AGING INC: $1.2M → 11%EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC: $1.1M → 11%ASTER AGING INC: $1.1M → 11%EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC: $1.0M → 11%EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC: $984k → 11%EAST VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES: $974k → 11%MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $131k → 11%MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $112k → 11%MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $103k → 11%MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $97k → 11%MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $93k → 11%MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $81k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CASA INC: $159k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CASA INC: $159k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CASA INC: $152k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CASA: $142k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $106k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $87k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $79k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CASA INC: $68k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS INC: $160k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS INC: $108k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS INC: $79k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS INC: $77k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS INC: $69k → 11%FSL PROGRAMS: $4.0M → 11%FSL PROGRAMS: $3.1M → 11%FSL PROGRAMS: $3.0M → 11%FSL PROGRAMS: $2.9M → 11%FSL PROGRAMS: $2.5M → 11%FSL PROGRAMS: $2.2M → 11%ALLTHRIVE 365 FKA FSL PROGRAMS: $1.9M → 11%FSL PROGRAMS: $1.7M → 11%DOVES INC: $113k → 11%DOVES INC: $112k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $74k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $71k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $69k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158M · 55 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

55 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
20

Total granted

$158M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+59%

Still filing today

38%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC)
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8.9M · revenue +13% · 42% of their budget
  • SC
    SUN CITY AREA INTERFAITH SERVICES INC DBA BENEVILLA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $5.2M · revenue +64%
  • BH
    Banner Health
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4.1M · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $370k
  • S
    SUNTREE
    one grant, 2017 · $256k
  • HS
    HOMEINSTEAD SENIOR CARE
    one grant, 2017 · $189k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Southeastern Arizona Community Unique Services

To provide services to the elderly and disabled in the form of congregate and home delivered meals, housekeeping services, in-home nursing care, home health aides, and other services.

Health
3
Fsl Real Estate Services

To provide home and community-based services and develop energy-efficient, affordable housing to promote health, independence and dignity for all.

—
4
Pima Council on Aging

Our mission is to promote dignity and respect for aging, and to advocate for independence in the lives of Pima County's older adults and their families, now and for generations to come.

Human Services
5
Fsl Management

Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age independently, safely, and with peace of mind.

Housing & Shelter
6
Hospice of the Valley

Bringing comfort, dignity, and compassionate care to our community.

Human Services
7
Fsl Pathways

Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age independently, safely and with peace of mind.

—
8
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
9
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
10
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
11
VerdeCares Inc

Non-medical senior support services to area residents

Health
12
Sun Health Services

Sun health champions superior health and wellbeing through philanthropy, inspired living and wellness programs.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest; the most unlike its peers is All Faith Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF PHOENIX: $22,151,244 · OtherCITY OF PHOENIXMARICOPA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $16,534,022 · OtherMARICOPA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENTATTENTIVE HOME HEALTH: $13,076,501 · OtherATTENTIVE HOME HEALTHLIVE WELL SENIOR CARE LLC: $4,806,789 · OtherYWCA Metropolitan Phoenix: $4,692,970 · OtherMOM'S MEALS - PUR FOODS LLC: $3,759,554 · Other+52 more: $39,376,172 · Other+52 moreFSL PROGRAMS: $21,414,900 · Human ServicesFSL PROGRAMSASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC): $8,866,389 · Human ServicesASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLE…SUN CITY AREA INTERFAITH SERVICES INC DBA BENEVILLA: $5,166,525 · Human ServicesSUN CITY AREA INTERFAITH SERVIC…AZCEND: $3,480,949 · Human ServicesAZCENDOAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC: $2,837,526 · Human ServicesOAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC+7 more: $3,112,632 · Human Services+7 moreBanner Health: $4,097,400 · HealthTempe Community Action Agency Inc: $3,082,058 · Community ImprovementArizona Senior Citizens Law Project: $2,475,962 · Crime & LegalKIKSTART INC: $318,632 · Food & NutritionLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST: $226,474 · ReligionINDIAN SENIOR ASSOC OF ARIZONA: $28,200 · Arts & Culture
Other$104,397,252Human Services$44,878,921Health$4,097,400Community Improvement$3,082,058Crime & Legal$2,475,962Food & Nutrition$318,632Religion$226,474Arts & Culture$28,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFSL PROGRAMS: $21,414,900 over 8y, 26% of budgetASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC): $8,866,389 over 8y, 42% of budgetSUN CITY AREA INTERFAITH SERVICES INC DBA BENEVILLA: $5,166,525 over 8y, 15% of budgetYWCA Metropolitan Phoenix: $4,692,970 over 8y, 50% of budgetBanner Health: $4,097,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAZCEND: $3,480,949 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetTempe Community Action Agency Inc: $3,082,058 over 8y, 10% of budgetOAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC: $2,837,526 over 8y, 33% of budgetArizona Senior Citizens Law Project: $2,475,962 over 8y, 100% of budgetDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC: $1,665,181 over 8y, 27% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $952,782 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $733,709 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFoothills Caring Corps Inc: $567,653 over 8y, 60% of budgetFSL HOME IMPROVEMENTS: $456,123 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDLY HOUSE INC: $327,424 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetKIKSTART INC: $318,632 over 3y, 12% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $271,247 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST: $226,474 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDOVES INCORPORATED: $224,373 over 2y, 37% of budgetCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc: $102,390 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION ONE INC: $35,444 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL FAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetINDIAN SENIOR ASSOC OF ARIZONA: $28,200 over 2y, 53% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FSL PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds ASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC) ↗
  • Who funds SUN CITY AREA INTERFAITH SERVICES INC DBA BENEVILLA ↗
  • Who funds YWCA Metropolitan Phoenix ↗
  • Who funds Banner Health ↗
  • Who funds AZCEND ↗
  • Who funds Tempe Community Action Agency Inc ↗
  • Who funds OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Senior Citizens Law Project ↗
  • Who funds DUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
  • Who funds MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Caring Corps Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Mary's Food Bank A…Virginia G Piper Char…Arizona Community Fou…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…Thunderbirds CharitiesArizona Food Bank Net…Valley of the Sun Uni…Mesa United Way IncUnited Food BankScan Desert Health Pl…Pinal-Gila Council fo…Pima Council on Aging
St Mary's Food Bank AllianceAZ38.3× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Arizona Community Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · Arizona Food Bank Network · Valley of the Sun United Way · Mesa United Way Inc · United Food Bank · Scan Desert Health Plan Inc · Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens · Pima Council on Aging

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Area Agency on Aging Region One’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home