Skip to content

· Public charity

Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc

Funding services for the elderly

$6.0M
Granted FY2023
19
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$15MCommunity Improvement$7.9MHealth$1.9MEnvironment$555kCrime & Legal$490kPublic Benefit$408kReligion$328kOther$0
02FY2023 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $5,030,324, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,952,155 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $921,831 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $109k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $915k
  • $250k+5 grants · $4.0M
$93,445
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SENIOR CITIZENS OF CENTRAL IL$1,890,422
IL VALLEY ECO DEVT CORP$655,359
CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP$607,680
PRAIRIE COUNCIL ON AGING$474,578
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CIL$362,893
GREATER ALL NATIONS$235,266
MACOUPIN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT$119,588
LOCUST STREET RESOURCE CENTER$119,091
MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$101,283
LAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL ASSISTANCE$93,445
WEST CENTRAL TRANSIT DISTRICT$93,237
Individual grant recipient$84,773
BEST SENIOR CARE$68,553
SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY$45,182
MENARD COUNTY BOARD$29,574
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $9.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP: $661k → 9%IL VALLEY ECO DEVT CORP: $656k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CIL: $363k → 14%SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY: $145k → 16%CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP: $608k → 9%IL VALLEY ECO DEVT CORP: $655k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CIL: $360k → 14%SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY: $68k → 16%CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP: $595k → 9%IL VALLEY ECO DEVT CORP: $617k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CIL: $333k → 14%SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY: $67k → 16%CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP: $516k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CIL: $300k → 14%SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY: $51k → 16%CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP: $485k → 9%ILLINOIS VALLEY ECONOMIC DEV CORP: $519k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CIL: $283k → 14%SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY: $47k → 16%CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP: $455k → 9%ILLINOIS VALLEY ECONOMIC DEV CORP: $517k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $270k → 14%SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY: $45k → 16%CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP: $445k → 9%IL VALLEY ECO DEVT CORP: $510k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $210k → 14%SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY: $41k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26M · 22 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$26M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+37%

Still filing today

45%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SENIOR SERVICES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.6M · revenue +102% · 37% of their budget
  • CE
    CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +34%
  • IV
    ILLINOIS VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • CS
    CARMODY SENIOR CARE
    one grant, 2017 · $36k
  • SJ
    St John's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Francisgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +37%
  • IC
    IMPACT CILgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action of Southern Kentucky Inc

We team with Community partners to provide human services with dignity and respect, empowering people in Southern Kentucky to achieve stability and economic security.

—
2
Capital Area Agency On Aging Inc

The agency's mission is to advocate and provide services to enhance the quality of life for older adults.

Human Services
3
Living Center Inc

Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.

—
4
Washington County Commission On Aging Inc/Area Agency On Aging

To plan and coordinate systems of services which help older americans, those with disabilities regardless of age and caregivers, maintain their independence through a variety of programs. these programs include, but are not limited to,…

—
5
Cerebral Palsy of Southwestern Illinois

Providing services to people afflicted with cerebral palsy and similar disabilities.

—
6
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
7
Southside Senior Citizen Center

Adults day care

Human Services
8
Opportunity of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Provide various services to people with disabilities, such as: day services, community living, and family services.

—
9
Community Home Environmental Learning Project Inc

The Community Home Environmental learning Project, Inc. provides services to enable seniors and disabled citizens of Macon Couty to remain in their homes as long as they are safely able to do so.

Human Services
10
Senior Citizens of Lincoln County

Serving the community to improve the quality of life for our senior citizens focusing on healthy eating, active living and socializing as well as assisting the community with durable medical supplies and some basic needs.

—
11
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
12
East Central Il Area Agency On Aging Inc

Our mission is to lead and advocate for inclusive resources and services that empower the optimal aging of east central illinois' diverse older adults, individuals with disabilities, and their care partners.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Locust Street Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is St John's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Francis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION: $3,766,103 · Human ServicesCEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATIONILLINOIS VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $3,475,046 · Human ServicesILLINOIS VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPO…COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC: $2,119,583 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CENTRAL IL…SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY: $464,004 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERVICES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $8,602,162 · Food & NutritionSENIOR SERVICES OF CENTRAL ILLINOISPRAIRIE COUNCIL ON AGING: $2,857,757 · OtherPRAIRIE COUNCIL ON AGINGMacoupin County Health Department: $779,796 · OtherMacoupin County Health Depart…IL VALLEY ECO DEVT CORP: $695,883 · OtherIL VALLEY ECO DEVT CORPMONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $522,300 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH DEPA…WEST CENTRAL TRANSIT DISTRICT: $370,286 · OtherWEST CENTRAL TRANSIT DISTRICTGREATER ALL NATION TABERNACLE: $327,920 · OtherBEST SENIOR CARE: $268,297 · OtherWEST CENTRAL MASS TRANSIT DISTRICT: $252,226 · Other+8 more: $662,493 · Other+8 moreLocust Street Resource Center: $520,847 · HealthSt John's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Francis: $20,179 · HealthLAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL AID INC: $489,502 · Crime & LegalSENIOR CITIZENS OF LOGAN COUNTY INC D/B/A OASIS SENIOR CENTER: $102,676 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$9,824,736Food & Nutrition$8,602,162Other$6,736,958Health$541,026Crime & Legal$489,502Arts & Culture$102,676

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENIOR SERVICES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $8,602,162 over 9y, 37% of budgetCEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION: $3,766,103 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetILLINOIS VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $3,475,046 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetPRAIRIE COUNCIL ON AGING: $2,857,757 over 9y, 33% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC: $2,119,583 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetLocust Street Resource Center: $520,847 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetLAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL AID INC: $489,502 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY: $464,004 over 9y, 36% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF LOGAN COUNTY INC D/B/A OASIS SENIOR CENTER: $102,676 over 9y, 8.4% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVIN: $45,084 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetSt John's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Francis: $20,179 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT CIL: $6,769 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SENIOR SERVICES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Locust Street Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds LAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL AID INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF LOGAN COUNTY INC D/B/A OASIS SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVIN ↗
  • Who funds St John's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Francis ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT CIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Meals on Wheels AmericaVA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Meals on Wheels America · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $6.1M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph