Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Illinois · Public charity

Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc

Funding services for the elderly

$6.0M
Granted FY2023
19
Itemized grants FY2023
19
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$5.0M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$93,445
Largest grant, FY2023
$1,890,422
Organizations funded a year
17 to 20
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$1.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202319$5.0M0%
FY202220$4.6M5%
FY202118$3.9M0%
FY202019$3.2M11%
FY201917$3.2M0%
FY201820$3.3M15%
FY201719$3.0Mn/a
95% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$15MCommunity Improvement$7.9MHealth$1.9MEnvironment$555kCrime & Legal$490kPublic Benefit$408kReligion$328kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Senior Services of Central Illinois$8,602,162937%
Cefs Economic Opportunity Corporation$3,766,10393%
Illinois Valley Economic Development Corporation$3,475,04686%
Prairie Council on Aging$2,857,757933%
Community Action Partnership of Central Illinois Inc$2,119,58394%
Macoupin County Health Department$779,7969n/a
Il Valley Eco Devt Corp$695,8839n/a
Montgomery County Health Department$522,3009n/a
Locust Street Resource Center$520,84793%
Land of Lincoln Legal Aid Inc$489,50291%
Show all 24 grantees
All grantees of Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Senior Services of Central Illinois$8,602,162937%
Cefs Economic Opportunity Corporation$3,766,10393%
Illinois Valley Economic Development Corporation$3,475,04686%
Prairie Council on Aging$2,857,757933%
Community Action Partnership of Central Illinois Inc$2,119,58394%
Macoupin County Health Department$779,7969n/a
Il Valley Eco Devt Corp$695,8839n/a
Montgomery County Health Department$522,3009n/a
Locust Street Resource Center$520,84793%
Land of Lincoln Legal Aid Inc$489,50291%
Senior Citizens of Christian County$464,004936%
West Central Transit District$370,2866n/a
Greater All Nation Tabernacle$327,9204n/a
Best Senior Care$268,2979n/a
West Central Mass Transit District$252,2263n/a
Menard County Board$178,0619n/a
Bf Homecare$122,3385n/a
Senior Citizens of Logan County Inc D/B/A Oasis Senior Center$102,67698%
Cass County Health Department$73,5322n/a
Greene County Health$55,7289n/a
Springfield Center for Independent Livin$45,08462%
Carmody Senior Care$35,6791n/a
St John's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Francis$20,17910%
Impact Cil$6,76911%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($145k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 12 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSenior Services of Central Illinois: $8,602,162 over 9y, 37% of budgetCefs Economic Opportunity Corporation: $3,766,103 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetIllinois Valley Economic Development Corporation: $3,475,046 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetPrairie Council on Aging: $2,857,757 over 9y, 33% of budgetCommunity Action Partnership of Central Illinois Inc: $2,119,583 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetLocust Street Resource Center: $520,847 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetLand of Lincoln Legal Aid Inc: $489,502 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetSenior Citizens of Christian County: $464,004 over 9y, 36% of budgetSenior Citizens of Logan County Inc D/B/A Oasis Senior Center: $102,676 over 9y, 8.4% of budgetSpringfield Center for Independent Livin: $45,084 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetSt John's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Francis: $20,179 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetImpact Cil: $6,769 over 1y, 0.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Meals on Wheels Ameri…Amazonsmile Foundation
Meals on Wheels AmericaVA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Meals on Wheels America · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc?

Find your warmest path to Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc

How much does Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc give?
Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc reported 19 itemized grants totaling $5,030,324, out of $5,952,155 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 17 and 20 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Human Services (55%), Community Improvement (30%), Health (7%).
Who are Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Senior Services of Central Illinois ($8.6M), Cefs Economic Opportunity Corporation ($3.8M), Illinois Valley Economic Development Corporation ($3.5M).
Does Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Meals on Wheels America, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc based?
Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $6.1M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home