· Public charity
Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc
Funding services for the elderly
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $5,030,324 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,952,155 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $921,831 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $109k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $915k
- $250k+5 grants · $4.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SENIOR CITIZENS OF CENTRAL IL | $1,890,422 |
| IL VALLEY ECO DEVT CORP | $655,359 |
| CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP | $607,680 |
| PRAIRIE COUNCIL ON AGING | $474,578 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CIL | $362,893 |
| GREATER ALL NATIONS | $235,266 |
| MACOUPIN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $119,588 |
| LOCUST STREET RESOURCE CENTER | $119,091 |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $101,283 |
| LAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL ASSISTANCE | $93,445 |
| WEST CENTRAL TRANSIT DISTRICT | $93,237 |
| Individual grant recipient | $84,773 |
| BEST SENIOR CARE | $68,553 |
| SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY | $45,182 |
| MENARD COUNTY BOARD | $29,574 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $9.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSSENIOR SERVICES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS9× · 2017–2025 · $8.6M · revenue +102% · 37% of their budget
- CECEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +34%
- IVILLINOIS VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION8× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +64%
Funded once
- CSCARMODY SENIOR CAREone grant, 2017 · $36k
- SJSt John's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Francisgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +37%
- ICIMPACT CILgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We team with Community partners to provide human services with dignity and respect, empowering people in Southern Kentucky to achieve stability and economic security.
The agency's mission is to advocate and provide services to enhance the quality of life for older adults.
Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.
To plan and coordinate systems of services which help older americans, those with disabilities regardless of age and caregivers, maintain their independence through a variety of programs. these programs include, but are not limited to,…
Providing services to people afflicted with cerebral palsy and similar disabilities.
Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…
Adults day care
Provide various services to people with disabilities, such as: day services, community living, and family services.
The Community Home Environmental learning Project, Inc. provides services to enable seniors and disabled citizens of Macon Couty to remain in their homes as long as they are safely able to do so.
Serving the community to improve the quality of life for our senior citizens focusing on healthy eating, active living and socializing as well as assisting the community with durable medical supplies and some basic needs.
Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes
Our mission is to lead and advocate for inclusive resources and services that empower the optimal aging of east central illinois' diverse older adults, individuals with disabilities, and their care partners.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Locust Street Resource Center and the most unlike its peers is St John's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Francis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PRAIRIE COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds Locust Street Resource Center ↗
- Who funds LAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL AID INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF LOGAN COUNTY INC D/B/A OASIS SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVIN ↗
- Who funds St John's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Francis ↗
- Who funds IMPACT CIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Meals on Wheels America · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc?
Find your warmest path to Area Agency on Aging for Lincolnland Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.