Skip to content

· Community foundation

Arctic Slope Community Foundation Inc

Strengthen our culture of giving and improve the quality on life among the people of the Arctic Slope region of Alaska by providing and administering grants to support the community health and economic stability of the villages of Point Hope, Point Lay, Wainwright, Atqasuk, Barrow, Nuiqsut, Anaktuvuk Pass, and Kaktovik.

$806k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$198k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$4.7MFood & Nutrition$2.5MArts & Culture$1.1MRecreation & Sports$995kPhilanthropy$761kEducation$567kReligion$319kPublic Safety & Disaster$279kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $688,830, the rows itemized in this filing. The $805,517 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $116,687 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $290k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $399k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Utqiagvik Presbyterian Church$198,000
Arctic Education Foundation$133,000
Point Hope Booster Club$68,000
Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commiss$48,922
Nagsragmiut Tribal Council$32,795
City of Anaktuvuk Pass$30,000
Ilisagvik College$30,000
City of Wainwright$27,887
Point Hope Episcopal Church$25,000
Whaler Athletics Fundraising$25,000
Point Hope Assembly of God$25,000
New Beginnings Church of God$19,816
Kuukpik Presbyterian Church$15,410
Village of Wainwright$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Red Cross of Alaska: $25k → 10%Covenant House Alaska: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 25 repeat orgs$732k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
13

Total granted

$11M
$682k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+89%

Still filing today

32%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AE
    Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission
    6× · 2019–2024 · $891k · revenue +22%
  • AH
    ALASKA HUMANITIES FORUM
    2× · 2020–2021 · $800k · revenue +1%
  • AE
    ARCTIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $431k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • BS
    BARROW SEARCH & RESCUEgraduated
    2× · 2018–2022 · $200k · revenue +192% · 45% of their budget
  • IA
    INTERGENERATIONAL ARCTIC MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $184k
  • UC
    UIC Construction LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $58k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Historical Publication Association
Education
2
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
3
The Aleut Foundation
Education
4
Alaskans for Better Elections Foundation
Civil Rights
5
Alaska Native Sisterhood Association

Cultural activities and classes - 20 participants per class - 6 classes

Human Services
6
Arctic Slope Community Foundation Inc

Strengthen our culture of giving and improve the quality on life among the people of the Arctic Slope region of Alaska by providing and administering grants to support the community health and economic stability of the villages of Point…

Philanthropy
7
Alaska Police & Fire Chaplains

Offer assistance for emergency personnel.

—
8
Alaska Nannut Co-Management Council

The alaska nannut co-management council (ancc) was established to represent the collective alaska native voice in polar bear co-management. ancc is a tribally authorized organization with membership consisting of the 15 tribes in alaska…

Animals
9
Association of Alaska Housing Authorities

Provide training and information to housing authority employees and representatives throughout the state of alaska.

Housing & Shelter
10
Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska

Icc alaska exists as the unified voice and collective spirit of alaskan inuit, to promote, protect and advance inuit culture and society.

Arts & Culture
11
Arctic Winter Games Team Alaska

As the official representative of the state of alaska, to promote and integrate athletic and cultural activities for the youth of alaska with the youth of the international circumpolar north.

Recreation & Sports
12
Alaska Mountain Rescue Group

To finding and doing basic medical to people lost or have perished in the wilderness. Our goal is to bring people home safely!

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arctic Slope Native Association; the most unlike its peers is Point Hope Booster Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Utqiagvik Presbyterian Church: $1,124,629 · OtherUtqiagvik Presbyterian ChurchAlaska Eskimo Whaling Commission: $890,936 · OtherAlaska Eskimo Whaling CommissionIpiutak Community Foundation: $567,490 · OtherIpiutak Community FoundationMidnight Sun Basketball: $438,305 · OtherMidnight Sun BasketballNagsragmiut Tribal Council: $235,603 · OtherNORTH SLOPE BOROUGH: $198,630 · OtherCity of Kaktovik: $194,216 · OtherNorth Slope Borough School Di: $192,737 · OtherARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $189,234 · Other+19 more: $1,587,484 · Other+19 moreBoys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska: $4,162,883 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alask…+1 more: $103,060 · Youth DevelopmentARCTIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $431,050 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $190,000 · EducationIlisagvik College: $189,000 · EducationALASKA HUMANITIES FORUM: $800,373 · Arts & CultureBARROW SEARCH & RESCUE: $200,336 · Public Safety & DisasterREINHOLDS FIRE COMPANY NO 1: $40,347 · Public Safety & DisasterSKIKU INC FORMERLY NORDIC JOURNEYS INC: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $15,000 · Human ServicesBETHEL COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION: $9,513 · Philanthropy
Other$5,619,264Youth Development$4,265,943Education$810,050Arts & Culture$800,373Public Safety & Disaster$240,683Recreation & Sports$40,000Human Services$40,000Philanthropy$9,513

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska: $4,162,883 over 5y, 14% of budgetAlaska Eskimo Whaling Commission: $890,936 over 6y, 24% of budgetALASKA HUMANITIES FORUM: $800,373 over 2y, 13% of budgetARCTIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $431,050 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetBARROW SEARCH & RESCUE: $200,336 over 2y, 45% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $190,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $189,234 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIlisagvik College: $189,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPOINT HOPE BOOSTER CLUB: $103,060 over 3y, 26% of budgetREINHOLDS FIRE COMPANY NO 1: $40,347 over 1y, 11% of budgetSKIKU INC FORMERLY NORDIC JOURNEYS INC: $40,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETHEL COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION: $9,513 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA HUMANITIES FORUM ↗
  • Who funds ARCTIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BARROW SEARCH & RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Ilisagvik College ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Art Alliance Company ↗
  • Who funds POINT HOPE BOOSTER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds REINHOLDS FIRE COMPANY NO 1 ↗
  • Who funds SKIKU INC FORMERLY NORDIC JOURNEYS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community FoundationAK26× affinity11 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · Alaska Children's Trust · Barrow Utilities and Electric Coop · Richard L and Diane M Block Foundation · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arctic Slope Community Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arctic Slope Community Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arctic Slope Community Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Arctic Slope Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arctic Slope’s filings →

    More from the funding graph