Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Archibald Family Foundation #0724900 Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$320k
Granted FY2026still arriving
32
Grants FY2026still arriving
8
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2026.

Arts & Culture$572kEducation$173kHealth$126kEnvironment$77kAnimals$49kInternational$9kOther$655k
02FY2026 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k23 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $73k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION$72,500
UTAH FILM CENTER$37,500
THE FILM COLLABORATIVE$25,000
SOUTHERN DOCUMENTARY FUND$25,000
WALKING IRIS MEDIA$25,000
WOMEN MAKE MOVIES$25,000
BETH ISRAEL$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$10,000
WORLD WILDLIFE DEFENSE FUND$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MASSACHUSETTS$9,500
WGBH$8,000
WAYNFLETE SCHOOL$5,000
NORTHWOOD SCHOOL$5,000
BOSTON WOMEN'S HEALTH BOOK COLLECTIVE$5,000
CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION: $73k → 6%BETH ISRAEL: $10k → 7%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MASSACHUSETTS: $10k → 16%WALKING IRIS MEDIA: $25k → 10%AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 17%STORYLINE: $25k → 20%OUTSIDER FILM & ARTS FESTIVALS: $25k → 10%WORLD WILDLIFE DEFENSE FUND: $15k → 14%SOUTHERN DOCUMENTARY FUND: $25k → 11%UTAH FILM CENTER: $38k → 8%INCITE PRODUCTIONS INC: $25k → 12%KARTEMQUIN EDUCATIONAL FILMS: $25k → 14%WAYNFLETE SCHOOL: $20k → 7%MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION: $50k → 6%WALKING IRIS MEDIA: $22k → 10%MPTF FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 17%DOC SOCIETY INC IDENTITY CRISIS: $30k → 20%WORLD WILDLIFE DEFENSE FUND: $15k → 14%UTAH FILM CENTER: $25k → 8%INCITE PRODUCTIONS INC: $25k → 12%BREAKWATER SCHOOL: $10k → 7%MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION: $41k → 6%STRAY CAT ALLIANCE: $15k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 17%NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $25k → 20%WORLD WILDLIFE DEFENSE FUND: $15k → 14%UTAH FILM CENTER: $25k → 8%BREAKWATER SCHOOL: $10k → 7%MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION: $40k → 6%NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $25k → 20%WORLD WILDLIFE DEFENSE FUND: $12k → 14%MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION: $20k → 6%WORLD WILDLIFE DEFENSE FUND: $12k → 14%MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION: $20k → 6%INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION: $55k → 14%INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION: $40k → 14%INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%THE FILM COLLABORATIVE: $25k → 14%THE FILM COLLABORATIVE: $25k → 14%THE FILM COLLABORATIVE: $15k → 14%WOMEN MAKE MOVIES: $50k → 17%WOMEN MAKE MOVIES: $25k → 17%WOMEN MAKE MOVIES: $13k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC: $25k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC: $25k → 17%HOPE HOUSE: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
IL
NY
MA
CA
UT
CO
NC
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 36 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2026, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
9

Total granted

$1.4M
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+6%

Still filing today

81%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthAnimalsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN
    6× · 2021–2026 · $244k · revenue +120%
  • UF
    UTAH FILM CENTER
    3× · 2022–2026 · $88k · revenue +79%
  • WM
    WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $88k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • DS
    DOC SOCIETY INC IDENTITY CRISIS
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • KE
    KARTEMQUIN EDUCATIONAL FILMS
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -45%
  • SI
    STORYLINE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
3
The British Academy of Film and Television Arts North America Inc

The specific purposes for which bafta na is organized is to promote, maintain, improve and advance original and creative work among individuals employed professionally in film and television production and allied industries, to create and…

Arts & Culture
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
12
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Roundabout Theatre Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterPregnancy Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts CentersCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,526

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
25/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN — $243,500 · OtherNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION INWORLD WILDLIFE DEFENSE FUND — $79,000 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE DEFENSE FUNDINCITE PRODUCTIONS INC — $50,000 · OtherINCITE PRODUCTIONS INCBOSTON WOMENS HEALTH BOOK COLLECTIVE INC — $43,000 · OtherBOSTON WOMENS HEALTH BOOK COLLECTIVE INCWGBH — $39,000 · OtherWGBHDOC SOCIETY INC IDENTITY CRISIS — $30,000 · OtherNORTHWOOD SCHOOL — $26,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · OtherKARTEMQUIN EDUCATIONAL FILMS — $25,000 · OtherSTORYLINE INC — $25,000 · Other+8 more — $69,500 · Other+8 moreINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION IN…UTAH FILM CENTER — $87,500 · Arts & CultureUTAH FILM CENTERWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $87,500 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INCTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $65,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INCROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INCNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INCWALKING IRIS MEDIA — $47,000 · Arts & CultureWALKING IRIS MEDIAOUTSIDER FILM AND ARTS FESTIVAL — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE — $25,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN DOCUMENTARY FUND — $25,000 · Arts & CultureBREAKWATER LEARNING — $39,000 · EducationBREAKWATER …THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON INC — $30,000 · EducationTHE CAMBRID…SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $29,000 · EducationSARAH LAWRE…WAYNFLETE SCHOOL — $25,000 · EducationWAYNFLETE S…HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES — $13,000 · EducationHOBART AND …BUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL — $12,000 · EducationBUCKINGHAM …UCLA FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDA…PROPRIETORS OF THE BOSTON ATHENAEUM — $10,000 · EducationPROPRIETORS…+1 more — $5,000 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $56,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $49,500 · HealthHOPE HOUSE INC — $20,000 · HealthNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC — $33,000 · EnvironmentSave the Whales — $16,000 · EnvironmentAppalachian Mountain Club — $10,000 · EnvironmentMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · EnvironmentSTRAY CAT ALLIANCE — $25,000 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife — $12,000 · AnimalsMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $12,000 · AnimalsAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $6,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $3,000 · International
Other$655,000Arts & Culture$572,000Education$173,000Health$125,500Environment$77,000Animals$49,000International$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN — $243,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER — $87,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $87,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $56,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $49,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWALKING IRIS MEDIA — $47,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBOSTON WOMENS HEALTH BOOK COLLECTIVE INC — $43,000 over 6y, 47% of budgetBREAKWATER LEARNING — $39,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC — $33,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $29,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKARTEMQUIN EDUCATIONAL FILMS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSTORYLINE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSTRAY CAT ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOUTSIDER FILM AND ARTS FESTIVAL — $25,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWAYNFLETE SCHOOL — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOUSE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSave the Whales — $16,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES — $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROPRIETORS OF THE BOSTON ATHENAEUM — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC — $10,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHADY HILL SCHOOL — $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncJohn D and Catherine …The Ford FoundationCatapult Film FundThe Jebediah Foundati…Perspective Media Ini…The Orchard FoundationThe Loring Wolcott & …The Schmidt Family Fo…Combined Jewish Phila…Vanguard Charitable E…The Chicago Community…
Boston Foundation IncMA19.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Catapult Film Fund · The Jebediah Foundation 7563-Xxxxxx00129 · Perspective Media Initiatives Inc · The Orchard Foundation · The Loring Wolcott & Coolidge Charitable Trust-I · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Chicago Community Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Archibald Family Foundation #0724900 Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Hope House Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in — 9% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
  • Proprietors of the Boston Athenaeum — 0% of income from government
  • Buckingham Browne & Nichols School — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Archibald Family Foundation #0724900 Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP?

Find your warmest path to Archibald Family Foundation #0724900 Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines