Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arbour Way Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

54% of Arbour Way Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
23
8
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Education$4.9MHealth$2.3MCivil Rights$250kEnvironment$223kInternational$100kArts & Culture$64kPhilanthropy$25kYouth Development$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $560k
  • $250k+5 grants · $3.4M
$150,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$113M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Pennsylvania$2,000,000
Children's Hospital Corporation dba Boston Childrens Hospital$500,000
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center$333,333
Nantucket Cottage Hospital$301,500
Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc$298,500
University of Pennsylvania$200,000
Brigham and Women's Hospital$150,000
Weill Cornell Medicine$100,000
The Wily Network Inc$60,000
Ukrainian Relief Mission Charitable Corporation$50,000
Miles for Military Incorporated$25,000
Artists Association Of Nantucket$19,800
Roca Pallin Youth Center$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Nantucket Cottage Hospital: $347k → 6%Ukrainian Relief Mission Charitable Corporation: $50k → 8%The Wily Network Inc: $60k → 8%Children's Hospital Corporation dba Boston Childrens Hospital: $500k → 16%University of Pennsylvania: $2.0M → 22%Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health: $25k → 8%Natural Resources Defense Council: $200k → 17%American Junior Golf Association: $8k → 7%Nantucket Cottage Hospital: $302k → 6%Ukrainian Relief Mission Charitable Corporation: $50k → 8%Brigham and Women's Hospital: $150k → 16%University of Pennsylvania: $2.0M → 22%Weill Cornell Medicine: $100k → 17%Artists Association Of Nantucket: $44k → 6%Brigham and Women's Hospital: $150k → 16%University of Pennsylvania: $200k → 22%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $343k → 17%Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: $23k → 6%Miles for Military Incorporated: $25k → 16%University of Pennsylvania: $200k → 22%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $333k → 17%Artists Association Of Nantucket: $20k → 6%Roca Pallin Youth Center: $10k → 16%American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc: $250k → 17%Nantucket Boys & Girls Club: $4k → 6%Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc: $299k → 6%Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc: $173k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 6 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$2.3M
$530k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $695k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentCivil RightsInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    2× · 2023–2024 · $677k
  • NC
    Nantucket Cottage Hospital
    2× · 2023–2024 · $648k
  • NG
    NANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $471k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +53%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +29%
  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
5
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

7
Nantucket Historical Association

The nantucket historical association preserves and interprets the history of nantucket through its programs, collections, and properties, in order to promote the island's significance and foster an appreciation of it among all audiences.

Arts & Culture
8
Northeast Medical Group Inc

To render medical treatment to patients without regard to ability to pay for such treatment, and to promote a high quality of medical care and other services for the benefit of all persons in the communities it serves.

9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roca Pallin Youth Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $4,400,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA+1 more — $60,000 · EducationMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center — $676,666 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering C…Nantucket Cottage Hospital — $648,000 · OtherNantucket Cottage HospitalMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $300,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCOR…Weill Cornell Medicine — $100,000 · OtherWeill Cornell MedicineARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC — $64,100 · Other+3 more — $21,900 · OtherChildren's Hospital Corporation — $500,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $25,000 · HealthDartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic — $20,000 · HealthNANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $471,000 · PhilanthropyMILES FOR MILITARY INCORPORATED — $25,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 · Civil RightsNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $200,000 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $22,800 · EnvironmentUKRAINIAN RELIEF MISSION CHARITABLE CORPORATION — $100,000 · International
Education$4,460,000Other$1,810,666Health$545,000Philanthropy$496,000Civil Rights$250,000Environment$222,800International$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $4,400,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $471,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUKRAINIAN RELIEF MISSION CHARITABLE CORPORATION — $100,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC — $64,100 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE WILY NETWORK — $60,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMILES FOR MILITARY INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $22,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCA PALLIN YOUTH CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC — $4,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arbour Way Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc4% of income from government
  • Artists Association of Nantucket Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph