· Private foundation
Aqsa Qureshi and Khalid Malik Foundation
Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
58% of Aqsa Qureshi and Khalid Malik Foundation’s FY2019 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Aqsa Qureshi and Khalid Malik Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $39k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k9 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ICNA RELIEF FREE MEDICAL CLINIC | $10,000 |
| KIDS WITH VISION | $9,900 |
| ALIGARH ALUMINI ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| NASIM FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| AGA KHAN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIST RED OAK | $2,000 |
| ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $1,000 |
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $500 |
| TEXAS CAMPAIGN ENVIRONMENT FUND | $150 |
| SOUP MOBILE INC | $100 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $361) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1061% since the first grant, against +188% for those funded once.
5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- KWKIDS WITH VISION INC3× · 2017–2019 · $22k
- AKAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA3× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue -54%
- AAALIGARH ALUMINI ASSOCIATION3× · 2017–2019 · $15k
Funded once
- IKIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +188%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $300
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Nanban foundation strives to provide free, high-quality financial education for all. the organization functions with the support of volunteers united by one common goal: knowledge sharing. embracing online education, we invite people of…
To effectively communicate science based information on food safety, nutrition, and health for the public good.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
New york institute of technology (nyit) offers various degree programs, including undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees, in more than 50 fields of study, including architecture and design; arts and sciences; (continued on…
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…
The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds NASIM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SOUPMOBILE INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Aqsa Qureshi and Khalid Malik Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aqsa Qureshi and Khalid Malik Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Aqsa Qureshi and Khalid Malik’s filings →