Skip to content

· Private foundation

Aptiv Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$979k
Granted FY2024still arriving
63
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$176k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$1.8MScience & Tech$1.4MInternational$900kHealth$577kEnvironment$520kCommunity Improvement$513kRecreation & Sports$262kEmployment$138kOther$0
02FY2024 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k34 grants · $138k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $416k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $426k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST FRC AND FTC IN US$175,500
GREENLIGHT FUND DETROIT$75,000
NACME$75,000
HONOR'S SYMPOSIUM CAREER FAIR$50,000
FIRST IN MICHIGAN$50,000
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK ENGINEERS$40,000
FIRST FRC IN US AND CANADA$36,050
FIRST ROBOTICS$27,000
FIRST FTC AND FLL MICHIGAN$24,200
FIRST FTC AND FLL IN US$21,100
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SUPPLY CHAIN$20,000
WINNING FUTURES$20,000
THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
LIGHTHOUSE ORG$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%COMFORT CASES INC: $9k → 8%COMFORT CASES INC: $15k → 8%SAME AS U: $5k → 5%COMFORT CASES: $15k → 8%POPE FRANCIS CENTER: $5k → 21%ORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 8%POPE FRANCIS CENTER: $3k → 21%MEND ON THE MOVE: $3k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $25k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $15k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
ID
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Aptiv Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Aptiv Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 40 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 49 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
78

Total granted

$4.6M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+27%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $746k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    6× · 2018–2024 · $307k · revenue +195%
  • CM
    Carnegie Mellon University
    5× · 2018–2022 · $205k · revenue +64%
  • OT
    ONE TREE PLANTED INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $195k · revenue ×30

Funded once

  • F
    FIRST
    one grant, 2018 · $141k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • C
    CODE2COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +411%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
2
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
3
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
6
Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education
7
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Free Bikes 4 Kidz - Detroit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/75
Grantees still filing
46/75
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST ROBOTICS: $999,350 · OtherFIRST ROBOTICSGREENLIGHT FUND DETROIT: $325,000 · OtherGREENLIGHT FUND DETROITUniversity of Michigan: $306,500 · OtherUniversity of MichiganTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $270,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYCarnegie Mellon University: $205,000 · OtherFIRST FRC AND FTC IN US: $175,500 · Other+130 more: $2,422,627 · Other+130 moreGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $872,588 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING F…+1 more: $500 · InternationalMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $360,000 · EducationMassachuse…WINNING FUTURES: $70,000 · EducationWINNING FU…OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationOHIO STATE…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $26,000 · Education+15 more: $123,500 · Education+15 moreONE TREE PLANTED INC: $195,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $30,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $9,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsFIRST IN MICHIGAN: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $140,000 · Community ImprovementSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $12,500 · Community ImprovementDETROIT HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCODE2COLLEGE: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $20,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentFREE BIKES 4 KIDZ - DETROIT: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentRHONDA WALKER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIRST NV: $5,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$4,703,977International$873,088Education$634,500Philanthropy$234,000Recreation & Sports$200,000Community Improvement$162,500Youth Development$133,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $872,588 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $360,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $306,500 over 6y, 23% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $205,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC: $195,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $140,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCODE2COLLEGE: $75,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetWINNING FUTURES: $70,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $55,306 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST IN MICHIGAN: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $47,500 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetNational Society of Black Engineers: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOCUSHOPE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMFORT CASES INC: $38,985 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $20,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Oakland County Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLINTON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAUTOMOTIVE HALL OF FAME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RAINBOW CONNECTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFREE BIKES 4 KIDZ - DETROIT: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT ECONOMIC CLUB: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRHONDA WALKER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRELEAF MICHIGAN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetNational Merit Scholarship Corporation: $8,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLGBT Detroit: $8,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPOPE FRANCIS CENTER: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Kiefer Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds ONE TREE PLANTED INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CODE2COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WINNING FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST IN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds National Society of Black Engineers ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSHOPE ↗
  • Who funds COMFORT CASES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI38.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · Fca Foundation · The Barton Malow Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · Henry Ford Health System

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aptiv Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aptiv Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Comfort Cases Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aptiv Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Aptiv Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 173 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aptiv’s filings →

More from the funding graph