Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Appelbaum Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$76kHealth$76kArts & Culture$73kEducation$49kReligion$11kScience & Tech$7kHuman Services$6kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lurie Hospital Childrens Research Fund$10,000
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago$7,500
Bernard Zell Anshe Emet Day School$5,000
Anshe Emet Synagogue$3,500
US Holocaust Memorial Museum$1,800
University of Chicago Booth School$1,500
National MS Society$1,000
Keshet$500
Special Olympics$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Jewish Family Service of the Desert: $500 → 11%Chicago Lighthouse for People Who are Blind or Visually Impaired: $3k → 14%Chicago Lighthouse for People Who are Blind or Visually Impaired: $3k → 14%Chicago Lighthouse for People Who are Blind or Visually Impaired: $3k → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly: $4k → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$257k · 24 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
23

Total granted

$257k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+25%

Still filing today

63%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    6× · 2019–2024 · $70k · revenue +57%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    6× · 2019–2024 · $27k · revenue +5%
  • RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $20k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • CR
    CHILDRENS RESEARCH FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • LC
    Lurie Childrens Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • RM
    RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVALgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
12
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago and the most unlike its peers is The Host Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Health CentersCommunity FoundationsClassical Music EnsemblesPublic University Foundatio…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr22%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr15%9%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr22%61%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,328

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Lurie Hospital Childrens Research Fund — $32,500 · OtherLurie Hospital Childrens Research FundMcCallum Theatre — $12,000 · OtherMcCallum TheatreCHILDRENS RESEARCH FUND — $12,000 · OtherCHILDRENS RESEARCH FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAEL — $6,800 · OtherNORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAELUniversity of Chicago Booth School — $6,000 · OtherLurie Childrens Hospital Foundation — $6,000 · OtherBarbara Sinatra Children's Center — $4,500 · Other+21 more — $39,500 · Other+21 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $70,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO…DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $27,200 · Arts & CultureThe United States …RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL A…HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL…+1 more — $1,500 · Arts & CultureBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL — $20,900 · EducationBERNARD ZELL …College of the Desert Foundation — $5,500 · EducationCollege of th…RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL — $5,000 · EducationRANCHO MIRAGE…DRAKE UNIVERSITY — $3,000 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERS…+3 more — $3,000 · Education+3 moreTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $7,500 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $4,750 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT — $500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $3,000 · HealthOHIO CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATES — $2,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 · HealthEndeavor Health Clinical Operations — $500 · HealthAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $2,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $500 · InternationalSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$126,800Philanthropy$75,000Arts & Culture$51,700Education$37,400Human Services$12,750Health$6,500International$2,500Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $27,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL — $20,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCollege of the Desert Foundation — $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $4,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOST FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetKESHET — $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTART EARLY — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATES — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Northmoor Education Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds BERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED
  • Who funds College of the Desert Foundation
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY
  • Who funds THE HOST FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KESHET
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds START EARLY
  • Who funds OHIO CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATES
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds The Northmoor Education Foundation
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Harriet K and Howard N Bernstein Charitable Foundation · Jarvis Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Inland Empire Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Appelbaum Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Appelbaum Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Appelbaum Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph