How much did APCA INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of APCA INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

see part

2021

covid contactcontact tracin

2023

ahhaalaskanscare

2024

primary carecomprehensiveability paymatanuska-susitna boroughagesdistricteducation

2025

constructionbehavioralequippingnative primarypay constructingprimary carerefund

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k3 grants · $103k
$50k–250k14 grants · $1.8M
$250k+1 grant · $438k

$114,650

Median grant

States reached

$4.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

ALASKA HOSPITAL & HEALTHCARE ASSOC$437,530
SUNSHINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$211,026
SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION$199,695
NORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION$197,595
ANCHORAGE NEIGHBORHOOD$176,028
COPPER RIVER NATIVE ASSOCIATION$164,704
UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE$147,044
GIRDWOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC$129,339
CAMAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC$114,650
SEWARD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$113,627
ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT$100,209
MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH SCHOOL$75,318
ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOC$69,362
KODIAK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$66,097
SOUTHEAST REGIONAL RESOURCE CENTER$62,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 75% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.3M · 10 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.3M

$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%

+111%

Still filing today

80%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AH
ALASKA HOSPITAL & HEALTHCARE ASSOC
3× · 2023–2025 · $763k · revenue +86%
SC
SUNSHINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
3× · 2021–2025 · $359k · revenue +104%
AN
ANCHORAGE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER
4× · 2018–2025 · $321k · revenue +39%

Funded once

IH
ILIULIUK HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $59k · revenue +111%
SV
SELDOVIA VILLAGE TRIBE
one grant, 2021 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Bering Omega Community Health Services

Bering omega community health services exists to nurture the well being and meet the physical emotional and spiritual needs of persons affected by hiv/aids through compassionate health care and social services.

Health

Maine Coast Regional Health Facilities

The Hospital is a not-for-profit entity established to provide health care services through its acute care facility and physician practices.

Health

South Peninsula Hospital Inc

South Peninsula Hospital promotes community health and wellness by providing personalized, high-quality, locally coordinated healthcare.

Health

Houlton Regional Hospital

Houlton Regional Hospital's purpose is to provide safe, compassionate, quality, cost effective care to communities we serve. We are dedicated to improving the health status of those we support through eduaction, treatment and…

Health

Northeast Montana Health Services

To deliver quality, cost-effective health care to the communities that we serve for improvement of human life.

Health

Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care

Health

Sebasticook Valley Health

Sebasticook Valley Health d/b/a Northern Light Sebasticook Valley Hospital is a critical access hospital whose mission is to be the regional leader in meeting the health needs of our communities, providing quality care, always treating…

Health

MaineHealth

MaineHealth is a voluntary, not-for-profit community and referral system of hospitals, dedicated to providing high quality health care services to all persons who seek care regardless of their sex, race, religion, age, color, sexual…

Health

Northwest Community Healthcare

NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health

Thunder Bay Community Health Servic

Thunder bay community health service commits its resources to building healthier communities.

Health

Central Peninsula General Hospital Inc

We are a community initiated and community nurtured organization dedicated to promoting wellness and providing high quality health care that ensures the confidence and loyalty of our patients. We strive to improve individual and community…

Health

South Peninsula Behavioral

Mental health counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for adults and children.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aleutian Pribilof Islands. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

16/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$1,711,232Other$1,556,457Education$125,000Community Improvement$81,246Religion$66,097

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community FoundationAK21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Valley Hospital Association Inc · Rasmuson Foundation · Direct Relief · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation APCA INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ALASKA HOSPITAL & HEALTHCARE ASSOC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +86% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 920034538 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ALASKA HOSPITAL & HEALTHCARE ASSOC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Apca Inc?

Find your warmest path to Apca Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

APCA INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Apca Inc?

More from the funding graph

APCA INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Apca Inc?

More from the funding graph