· Private foundation
Antrim Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Golden Monarch Equine Rescue Founda | $46,000 |
| Georgia State Scholarship Fdn | $14,000 |
| Georgia Environmental Foundation | $5,000 |
| St Luke's Episcopal Church | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Jones Scholars Emory University | $2,500 |
| Friends of Ponce Library Fdn | $2,000 |
| All Saints Episcopal Church | $2,000 |
| Ansley Park Foundation | $2,000 |
| USO of Georgia | $2,000 |
| Georgia Justice Center | $1,000 |
| Georgia Innocents Fdn | $1,000 |
| Salem College | $1,000 |
| Crossroads Ministries at St Lukes | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GMGOLDEN MONARCH EQUINE RESCUE FOUNDATION7× · 2019–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +704%
- UCUSO COUNCIL OF GEORGIA INC5× · 2019–2025 · $7k · revenue +19%
- ACATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC4× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- RCRED CLAY RANCH EQUINE RESCUE & SANCTUARY INCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -19%
- BDButterfly Dreams Farm Equine Therapy Incone grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -21%
- HPHigh Point IEA Incone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help end neglect and abuse equines
Rescue and care of neglected animals.
Save Protect and Rehabilitate Equines
James River Horse Foundation ("JRHF") provides humane care, safe sanctuary, rehabilitation & when possible, a second career for Thoroughbred racehorses that can no longer complete & may be at risk for abuse, neglect or slaughter. At its…
At Risk Equine
Heart of Gold Sanctuary rescues horses that are otherwise facing export for slaughter. or who are facing euthanasia due to injury, illness or behavioral issues. We work with each horse as an individual to provide shelter, proper diet and…
Equine rescue and rehabilitation
Preserving environmentally significant land and promoting national and international equestrian competition.
At GoldStar Stables, we are dedicated to rescuing horses from neglect, abuse, and abandonment. We work to improve the lives of the horses in our care by providing a safe haven for healing and rehabilitation, and by educating people in how…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia State University Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Golden Monarch Equine Rescue Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOLDEN MONARCH EQUINE RESCUE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RED CLAY RANCH EQUINE RESCUE & SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds USO COUNCIL OF GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds SALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Butterfly Dreams Farm Equine Therapy Inc ↗
- Who funds High Point IEA Inc ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Historic Oakland Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THIS OLD HORSE INC ↗
- Who funds JEKYLL ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Highgate Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Antrim Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Antrim Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Antrim Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.