Skip to content
Antoinette E Mimi & Herman Boehm Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Antoinette E Mimi & Herman Boehm Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Health$1.7MEducation$350kArts & Culture$75kReligion$27k
02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $226k
$36,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$36,000
CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT FUND INC$36,000
LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANCER$36,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$36,000
WEILL CORNELL DIVISION OF HEMATOLOGY AND MEDICAL ONCOLOGY$36,000
MANHATTAN HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$28,000
JAMES CANCER HOSPITAL AND SOLOVE RESEARCH CENTER$18,000
HADASSAH$2,000
CARING KIND$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UPSTAGE LUNG CANCER: $25k → 7%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANCER: $200k → 6%FIGHTING CHANCE: $25k → 7%MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE: $25k → 17%A-T CHILDREN'S PROJECT: $50k → 13%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $200k → 12%JAMES CANCER HOSPITAL AND SOLOVE RESEARCH CENTER: $18k → 15%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANCER: $36k → 6%MANHATTAN HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $150k → 17%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $36k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 15%NYU LANGONE - STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FELLOWSHIP: $125k → 17%MANHATTAN HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $28k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $250k → 17%CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT FUND INC: $200k → 17%CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT FUND INC: $36k → 17%AMERICAN - ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - DR RICHARD LEVINE'S CHARITY: $50k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $200k → 17%WEILL CORNELL DIVISION OF HEMATOLOGY AND MEDICAL ONCOLOGY: $200k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $36k → 17%WEILL CORNELL DIVISION OF HEMATOLOGY AND MEDICAL ONCOLOGY: $36k → 17%AMAS MUSICAL THEATRE: $25k → 17%HADASSAH: $25k → 17%HADASSAH: $2k → 17%CARING KIND: $25k → 17%CARING KIND: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$718k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$1.4M
$700k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
+20%

Still filing today

38%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
HealthArts & CultureInternationalScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $236k
  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    2× · 2019–2020 · $236k · revenue +26%
  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT FUND INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $236k · revenue -7%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue +20%
  • NL
    NYU LANGONE - STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2019 · $125k
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute

The Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute ALCMI is dedicated to catalyzing and accelerating the discovery, development and delivery of new and more effective treatment options for lung cancer patients.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
6
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
7
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
10
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Hebrew University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Upstage Lung Cancer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $236,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERCANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT FUND INC: $236,000 · OtherCANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT FUND INCWEILL CORNELL DIVISION OF HEMATOLOGY AND MEDICAL ONCOLOGY: $236,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL DIVISION OF HEMATOLOGY AND MEDICAL ONCOLOGYLUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANCER: $236,000 · OtherLUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANCERMANHATTAN HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $178,000 · OtherMANHATTAN HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH FOUNDATIONNYU LANGONE - STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FELLOWSHIP: $125,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE - STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FELLOWSHIPOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITYCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - DR RICHARD LEVINE'S CHARITY: $50,000 · Other+2 more: $45,000 · OtherNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $236,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH …ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $27,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISE…UPSTAGE LUNG CANCER: $25,000 · HealthUPSTAGE LUNG CAN…FIGHTING CHANCE INC: $25,000 · HealthFIGHTING CHANCE …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $250,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIE…AMAS MUSICAL THEATRE INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $25,000 · Arts & CultureAtaxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc: $50,000 · Science & Tech
Other$1,442,000Health$313,000International$250,000Arts & Culture$75,000Science & Tech$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $236,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT FUND INC: $236,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $27,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMAS MUSICAL THEATRE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetUPSTAGE LUNG CANCER: $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIGHTING CHANCE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Antoinette E Mimi & Herman Boehm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Antoinette E Mimi & Herman Boehm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Antoinette E Mimi & Herman Boehm Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Antoinette E Mimi & Herman Boehm Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Antoinette E Mimi & Herman Boehm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home