Skip to content
Anticoagulation Forum Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Anticoagulation Forum Inc

The anticoagulation forum is a multidisciplinary nonprofit organization of health care professionals that will improve the quality of care for patients taking antithrombotic medications

$340k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$1.8MEducation$776k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$40,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$40,000
HENRY FORD HOSPITAL$40,000
FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$40,000
TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PA$40,000
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$40,000
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY$40,000
SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER$40,000
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER$20,000
FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES$20,000
IHC HEALTH SERVICES$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $156k → 16%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $20k → 14%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PA: $40k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $36k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $60k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY: $40k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $30k → 14%HENRY FORD HOSPITAL: $40k → 21%FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40k → 17%ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 11%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $46k → 14%IHC HEALTH SERVICES: $20k → 8%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $36k → 14%UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CLEVELAND MED CTR: $163k → 17%PRO MEDICA TOLEDO HOSPITAL: $36k → 18%SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER: $64k → 9%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40k → 19%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $60k → 16%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PA: $20k → 22%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $40k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY: $20k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $30k → 14%HENRY FORD HOSPITAL: $20k → 21%FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $24k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $24k → 14%UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CLEVELAND MED CTR: $60k → 17%PRO MEDICA TOLEDO HOSPITAL: $24k → 18%SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 9%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40k → 19%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $27k → 16%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $36k → 22%HENRY FORD HOSPITAL: $20k → 21%UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CLEVELAND MED CTR: $48k → 17%SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 9%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $32k → 19%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $24k → 16%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $24k → 22%UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CLEVELAND MED CTR: $24k → 17%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $60k → 16%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $36k → 16%MA GENERAL HOSPITAL: $36k → 16%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $24k → 16%MA GENERAL HOSPITAL: $24k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
SD
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
MD
NM
TN
SC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 17 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$2.2M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
0%

Still filing today

59%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $267k · revenue +58%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $220k · revenue +40%
  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    3× · 2021–2023 · $178k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • SF
    SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +13%
  • FH
    Fairview Health Services
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • IH
    IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
3
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
4
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
9
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
10
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
11
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
12
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Toledo Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Fairview Health Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $295,473 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $288,124 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANSANFORD: $124,000 · OtherSANFORDUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $119,895 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICOMEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY: $60,000 · OtherMEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $60,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $266,565 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATIONVanderbilt University Medical Center: $177,742 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical CenterBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $120,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INCHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $80,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMMAYO CLINIC: $66,426 · HealthMAYO CLINICTHE TOLEDO HOSPITAL: $60,000 · HealthTHE TOLEDO HOSPITALFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc: $60,000 · HealthFroedtert Hospital Foundation IncMary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital: $60,000 · HealthMary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital+3 more: $60,000 · Health+3 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $219,998 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $156,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF…THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERS…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $60,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSI…Emory University: $59,735 · EducationEmory University
Other$1,047,492Health$950,733Education$555,733

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $266,565 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $219,998 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $177,742 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $156,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $120,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $66,426 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO HOSPITAL: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $59,735 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFairview Health Services: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIHC HEALTH SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Children's Hospit…American Cancer Socie…Reach Out and Read IncAmerican Thrombosis a…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
The Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · American Cancer Society Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anticoagulation Forum Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anticoagulation Forum Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anticoagulation Forum’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home