Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Anticoagulation Forum Inc

The anticoagulation forum is a multidisciplinary nonprofit organization of health care professionals that will improve the quality of care for patients taking antithrombotic medications

$340k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Health$1.8MEducation$776k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$40,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$40,000
HENRY FORD HOSPITAL$40,000
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$40,000
SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER$40,000
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY$40,000
FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$40,000
TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PA$40,000
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER$20,000
FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES$20,000
IHC HEALTH SERVICES$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $156k → 16%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $20k → 14%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PA: $40k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $36k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $60k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY: $40k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $30k → 14%HENRY FORD HOSPITAL: $40k → 21%FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40k → 17%ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 11%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $46k → 14%IHC HEALTH SERVICES: $20k → 8%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $36k → 14%UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CLEVELAND MED CTR: $163k → 17%PRO MEDICA TOLEDO HOSPITAL: $36k → 18%SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER: $64k → 9%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40k → 19%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $60k → 16%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PA: $20k → 22%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $40k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY: $20k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $30k → 14%HENRY FORD HOSPITAL: $20k → 21%FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $24k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $24k → 14%UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CLEVELAND MED CTR: $60k → 17%PRO MEDICA TOLEDO HOSPITAL: $24k → 18%SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 9%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40k → 19%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $27k → 16%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $36k → 22%HENRY FORD HOSPITAL: $20k → 21%UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CLEVELAND MED CTR: $48k → 17%SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 9%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $32k → 19%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $24k → 16%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $24k → 22%UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CLEVELAND MED CTR: $24k → 17%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $60k → 16%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $36k → 16%MA GENERAL HOSPITAL: $36k → 16%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $24k → 16%MA GENERAL HOSPITAL: $24k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
SD
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
MD
NM
TN
SC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 17 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$2.2M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

59%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $267k · revenue +38%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $220k · revenue +40%
  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    3× · 2021–2023 · $178k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • SF
    SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • FH
    Fairview Health Services
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • IH
    IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
3
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
4
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
9
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
10
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
11
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
12
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Toledo Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Fairview Health Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%43%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,542

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $295,473 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $288,124 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANSANFORD — $124,000 · OtherSANFORDUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $119,895 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO — $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICOMEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY — $60,000 · OtherMEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $60,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $266,565 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATIONVanderbilt University Medical Center — $177,742 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical CenterBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $120,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INCHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $80,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMMAYO CLINIC — $66,426 · HealthMAYO CLINICTHE TOLEDO HOSPITAL — $60,000 · HealthTHE TOLEDO HOSPITALMary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital — $60,000 · HealthMary Hitchcock Memorial HospitalFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc — $60,000 · HealthFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc+3 more — $60,000 · Health+3 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $219,998 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $156,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $60,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSI…THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $60,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERS…Emory University — $59,735 · EducationEmory University
Other$1,047,492Health$950,733Education$555,733

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $266,565 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $219,998 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $177,742 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $156,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $120,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $66,426 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO HOSPITAL — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $59,735 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFairview Health Services — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIHC HEALTH SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Children's Hospit…American Cancer Socie…Reach Out and Read IncAmerican Thrombosis a…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
The Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · American Cancer Society Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anticoagulation Forum Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines