Skip to content
Anthony Crabb and Barbara Grasseschi Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Anthony Crabb and Barbara Grasseschi Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$436k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$930kPublic Benefit$706kCommunity Improvement$406kArts & Culture$371kScience & Tech$275kEnvironment$205kInternational$111kHousing & Shelter$61kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$5,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SONO$100,000
CTE FOUNDATION SONOMA COUNTY FUND$50,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
EVERYBODY VOTES$25,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTIST$25,000
FORWARD TN$25,000
THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER$25,000
VOTO LATINO$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
THE 19TH NEWS$15,000
PANORAMA GLOBAL$14,000
ON THE MOVE$10,000
FARM TO PANTRY$5,500
RAVEN PERFORMING ARTS THEATER$5,000
TURE WEST FILM CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ON THE MOVE: $10k → 9%TIDES CENTER: $5k → 10%GENERATION HOUSING: $5k → 9%GENERATION HOUSING: $5k → 9%GENERATION HOUSING: $5k → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $5k → 9%REACH FOR HOME: $5k → 9%REACH FOR HOME: $5k → 9%REACH FOR HOME: $5k → 9%REACH FOR HOME: $5k → 9%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $5k → 9%REACH FOR HOME: $5k → 9%REACH FOR HOME: $5k → 9%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $5k → 9%REACH FOR HOME: $5k → 9%REACH FOR HOME: $5k → 9%REACH FOR HOME: $5k → 9%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
IL
NY
OR
CA
VA
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 49 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
23

Total granted

$3.5M
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+33%

Still filing today

55%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FORWARD TN
    7× · 2018–2025 · $189k · revenue +122%
  • NF
    NPR FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $150k · revenue +49%
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
    6× · 2018–2025 · $133k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • V
    VPC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • SA
    SOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +8%
  • SC
    Sonoma County Library Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
Museum of Sonoma County

The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.

Arts & Culture
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
5
Solano Community Foundation

The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…

Philanthropy
6
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
7
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
8
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
9
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
10
Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County

We are a catalyst of equitable transformation, aligning partners and resources to implement values-based, data-driven, community-led solutions that help families reach their full potential. our vision - we see sonoma county transformed…

Community Improvement
11
Transformca dba Transform

Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos.

Community Improvement
12
California Farmland Trust

The mission of the California Farmland Trust is to help farmers protect the best farmland in the world.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voter Registration Project; the most unlike its peers is Farm to Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
34/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SONO: $788,500 · OtherHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SONOCTE FOUNDATION SONOMA COUNTY FUND: $395,000 · OtherCTE FOUNDATION SONOMA COUNTY FUNDUNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTIST: $275,000 · OtherUNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTIndividual grant recipient: $252,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVOTO LATINO INC: $213,350 · OtherVOTO LATINO INCNPR FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherNPR FOUNDATIONHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $141,000 · Other+43 more: $552,551 · Other+43 moreTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $133,350 · Civil RightsCIVIC TN: $60,000 · Civil RightsVET VOICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsFORWARD TN: $188,850 · Community Improvement+2 more: $7,250 · Community ImprovementKQED INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureTRUE WEST FILM CENTER: $33,500 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE 19TH NEWS: $27,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION: $22,500 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $5,500 · Arts & CultureRussian Riverkeeper: $70,000 · EnvironmentSONOMA LAND TRUST: $40,000 · EnvironmentLandPaths: $32,500 · EnvironmentTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $15,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY: $15,000 · EnvironmentREACH FOR HOME: $45,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $12,657 · Human ServicesON THE MOVE: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $5,000 · Human ServicesPANORAMA GLOBAL: $54,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,500 · International
Other$2,767,901Civil Rights$203,350Community Improvement$196,100Arts & Culture$174,000Environment$172,500Human Services$92,657International$70,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOTO LATINO INC: $213,350 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetFORWARD TN: $188,850 over 7y, 13% of budgetNPR FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $133,350 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRussian Riverkeeper: $70,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetCIVIC TN: $60,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $54,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREACH FOR HOME: $45,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetKQED INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFarm to Pantry: $43,500 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetSONOMA LAND TRUST: $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUE WEST FILM CENTER: $33,500 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetLandPaths: $32,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $30,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE 19TH NEWS: $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Climate Center: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $12,657 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSonoma County Library Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetVET VOICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetON THE MOVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLime Foundation: $6,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEALDSBURG EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,150 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEALDSBURG FUTURE FARMERS COUNTRY FAIR: $4,871 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSan Francisco Film Society: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALDSBURG CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VOTO LATINO INC ↗
  • Who funds FORWARD TN ↗
  • Who funds NPR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Russian Riverkeeper ↗
  • Who funds CIVIC TN ↗
  • Who funds PANORAMA GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds REACH FOR HOME ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds Farm to Pantry ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds TRUE WEST FILM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LandPaths ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE 19TH NEWS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds The Climate Center ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY ↗
  • Who funds SCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG ↗
  • Who funds Sonoma County Library Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VET VOICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ON THE MOVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Communi…The San Francisco Fou…Marin Community Found…Sonoma County Vintner…McNabb FoundationThe Tietz Family Foun…The Bancroft Foundati…Messing Family Charit…The Heck FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…ImpactassetsincSt Louis Community Fo…
Sonoma County Community FoundationCA37.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The Tietz Family Foundation · The Bancroft Foundation Inc · Messing Family Charitable Foundation · The Heck Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · St Louis Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anthony Crabb and Barbara Grasseschi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anthony Crabb and Barbara Grasseschi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anthony Crabb and Barbara Grasseschi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home