Skip to content
Anthony and Margaret Ciorciari Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Anthony and Margaret Ciorciari Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$14kHealth$10kHuman Services$7kYouth Development$3kArts & Culture$3kReligion$2kEducation$500Animals$110
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,030
Median grant
6
States reached
$874k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catholic Charities St Vincent Dinin$5,700
Reknown Health Foundation$4,000
CAAW$2,000
St Judes$2,000
St Rose of Lima$1,500
Eddy House$1,030
Food Bank of Nevada$1,000
Individual grant recipient$515
Tunnel to Towers$500
American Cancer Society$500
Norther Nevada Veterans Alliance$500
Nevada Humane Society$110
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Eddy House: $1k → 10%Eddy House: $515 → 10%Eddy House: $510 → 10%casa de Vida: $500 → 10%Eddy House: $400 → 10%Childrens Cabinet: $150 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 7 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$26k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+6%

Still filing today

57%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    EDDY HOUSE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue ×38
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +10%
  • S2
    STEP 2 INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • FK
    For Kids Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +6%
  • TN
    THE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +80%
  • CD
    CASA DE VIDA
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue -89%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Southern Nevada

The mission of the agency is to promote economic security through financialy responsible behavior to all consumers. regardless of the ability to pay.

—
2
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
3
Northern Nevada Children's Cancer Foundation

The foundation's mission is to enhance the quality of life for children with cancer and their families by providing financial assistance and compassionate support programs while advocating for increased research funds and raising public…

Philanthropy
4
Nevada Children's Foundation Inc

To support programs providing the highest quality service to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. these services include a residential program at eagle valley children's home and a respite program provided in the…

Human Services
5
Children's Hospital & Medical Center Foundation

Children's nebraska foundation (the foundation) was created in 1981 to raise awareness and manage and distribute funds to support children's hospital & medical center's (the hospital) premier pediatric services and programs. as an advocate…

Health
6
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare

To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.

Health
7
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
8
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
9
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
10
UNeMed Corporation

UNeMed Corporation's mission is to improve healthcare by fostering innovation, advancing biomedical research, and engaging entrepreneurs and industry to commercialize novel technologies.

Education
11
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
12
Nevada Casa Association Inc

The organization supports Nevada local CASA programs which recruit, train, retain and deploy volunteers to advocate for abused or neglected children.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Cabinet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sierra Nevada Performing Arts Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Catholic Charities St Vincent Dinin: $15,686 · OtherCatholic Charities St Vincent DininRenown Health Foundation: $4,000 · OtherRenown Health FoundationCAAW: $2,000 · OtherCAAWSt Rose of Lima: $1,500 · OtherSt Rose of LimaFood Bank of Nevada: $1,260 · OtherSTEP 2 INC: $1,192 · OtherTHE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $1,000 · Other+3 more: $1,125 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,700 · HealthST JUDE CHILD…For Kids Foundation: $1,000 · HealthFor Kids Foun…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $922 · HealthAMERICAN CANC…EDDY HOUSE: $2,767 · Human ServicesEDDY HOUSECASA DE VIDA: $500 · Human ServicesCASA DE VI…THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $150 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesSIERRA NEVADA PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION: $1,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$27,763Health$4,622Human Services$3,517Education$2,000Food & Nutrition$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDDY HOUSE: $2,767 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEP 2 INC: $1,192 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFor Kids Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $922 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE VIDA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA TERESA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Nell J Redfield F…The Confidence Founda…NV Energy Charitable …Enterprise Holdings F…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Northern NevadaNV17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · The Confidence Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anthony and Margaret Ciorciari Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anthony and Margaret Ciorciari Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anthony and Margaret Ciorciari Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Anthony and Margaret Ciorciari Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anthony and Margaret Ciorciari’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home