Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anthony a Schmidt Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$180kRecreation & Sports$81kInternational$71kYouth Development$65kHealth$39kPhilanthropy$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kScience & Tech$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CAPITAL CAMP$10,000
CITIZENS CLIMATE LOBBY$8,000
NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL$5,000
CASA - DOUGLAS COUNTY KS$5,000
USA FOR UNHCR$4,000
UNICEF$4,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$4,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$4,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$3,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$3,000
UNITED WAY OF DOUGLAS COUNTY$3,000
CAPUCHIN FRANCISCAN FRIARS$2,500
LAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER$2,000
PALESTINE CHILDRENS RELIEF FUND$2,000
HOPE FOR UKRAINE INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $800) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $500 → 12%JUSTICE MATTERS: $300 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
SC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$592k · 44 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
7

Total granted

$592k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-21%

Still filing today

55%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CITIZENS CLIMATE LOBBY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $86k · revenue +20%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +41%
  • United States Association for UNHCR
    8× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • LM
    LAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • SD
    SAFEHOUSE DENVER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
3
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
8
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
11
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
12
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Puppetry Arts Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
24/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CAPITAL CAMP: $81,000 · OtherST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CAPITAL CAMPBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF DC TEEN CENTER: $62,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF DC TEEN CENTERUNITED WAY OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $31,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INCCASA - DOUGLAS COUNTY KS: $15,750 · OtherCAPUCHIN FRANCISCAN FRIARS: $15,500 · Other+29 more: $91,395 · Other+29 moreCITIZENS CLIMATE LOBBY: $85,500 · Public BenefitCITIZENS CLIMATE…United States Association for UNHCR: $26,100 · InternationalUnited States As…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $25,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FU…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $21,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CON…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $33,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOU…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $19,480 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIF…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $10,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL…NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $7,525 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARK…CLIMATE AND ENERGY PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Environment+1 more: $700 · EnvironmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $26,000 · Human Services+2 more: $800 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,500 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $4,013 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $3,500 · HealthNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $12,000 · AnimalsLAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,750 · Animals
Other$297,145Public Benefit$85,500International$85,100Environment$73,705Human Services$26,800Health$18,013Animals$15,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE LOBBY: $85,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $33,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $31,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $26,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $26,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $25,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $21,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $19,480 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $7,525 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Land Institute: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $6,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $4,013 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE AND ENERGY PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR UKRAINE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRISE COLORADO: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPETRY ARTS INSTITUTE: $475 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJustice Matters INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITIZENS CLIMATE LOBBY ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Land Institute ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE AND ENERGY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR UKRAINE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Douglas County Community FoundationKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Douglas County Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anthony a Schmidt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anthony a Schmidt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anthony a Schmidt Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Anthony a Schmidt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anthony a Schmidt Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph