Skip to content
Anonymous Christian Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Anonymous Christian Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$86kReligion$27kPhilanthropy$25kHealth$22kYouth Development$10kPublic Benefit$5kEducation$4kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$18,600
Median grant
2
States reached
$174k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$18,600
JERICHO HOUSE ORPHANAGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BECOMING LIKE CHRIST: $10k → 12%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $500 → 14%MOUNTAIN LIFE CHUCH: $25k → 5%RALLY FOUNDATION: $11k → 8%WARRIOR2CITIZEN: $50k → 9%JERICHO HOUSE ORPHANAGE: $1k → 12%NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%GLOBAL SOJOURNS GIVING CIRCLE: $1k → 9%LILA BEAR FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%MOUNTAIN LIFE CHURCH: $5k → 5%MARINE CORPS COORDINATORS COUNCIL O: $5k → 8%Warrior2Citizen: $15k → 9%PARK CITY COMMUNITY CHURCH: $1k → 5%WARRIOR 2 CITIZEN: $10k → 9%SHINING STARS SCHOOL: $250 → 5%WARRIOR 2 CITIZEN: $5k → 9%YOUNG LIFE UT: $21k → 5%WARRIOR 2 CITIZEN: $5k → 9%YOUNGLIFE PARK: $19k → 5%PREGNANCY HELP CTR PARK CITY: $10k → 5%YOUNG LIFE UT: $10k → 5%PARK CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $4k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$136k · 3 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$136k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+151%

Still filing today

33%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationReligionInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WARRIOR TO CITIZEN INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $85k · 73% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $31k
  • BL
    Becoming Like Christ
    2× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue ×103
  • RF
    RALLY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +151%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Landmark Christian School

Landmark christian school partners with christian families by equipping college-bound students to embrace a christ-centered worldview, grow as servant leaders, and steward god's unique purpose for their lives.

—
2
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
3
Lux Classical Christian Inc

Lux Classical Christian Inc. is a 3-day-a-week Classical Christian education program. We encourage Christ-centered leaders who reflect His depth, wisdom, and virtue. We partner with parents to equip children spiritually, academically, and…

Education
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Summit Classical Christian School

Summit Classical Christian School is a PreK-12 school that exists to cultivate generations of joyful disciples of Christ by partnering with faithful Christian families to educate their children from a Biblical worldview using classical…

Education
6
Seattle Classical Christian School

Sccs builds the city of god by forming servant leaders who love goodness, truth, and beauty.

Education
7
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
8
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

—
9
Trinity Christian School Foundation

Advancing and furthering the purposes of trinity christian school.

Unclassified
10
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
11
Christian Living Communities

Christian living communities enriches the quality and dignity of life for older adults through services and care that reflect christian love, respect, and compassion toward each individual.

Housing & Shelter
12
Liberty Christian School Inc

To provide quality educational services to students in grades kindergarten through twelve, in a Christ-centered environment.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christ Led Communities Inc Formerly Christian Leadership Concepts; the most unlike its peers is Becoming Like Christ. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WARRIOR TO CITIZEN INC: $85,000 · OtherWARRIOR TO CITIZEN INCIndividual grant recipient: $31,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $18,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUNG LIFE PARK CITY: $10,000 · OtherPREGNANCY HELP CTR PARK CITY: $10,000 · Other+6 more: $13,000 · Other+6 moreNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL CHRIST…RALLY FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 · PhilanthropyRALLY FOUNDATIO…Becoming Like Christ: $20,000 · ReligionPark City Education Foundation: $3,555 · EducationTHE SHINING STARS SCHOOL: $250 · EducationTHE LILABEAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthGLOBAL SOJOURNS GIVING CIRCLE: $1,000 · International
Other$192,900Philanthropy$35,500Religion$20,000Education$3,805Health$1,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWARRIOR TO CITIZEN INC: $85,000 over 5y, 73% of budgetBecoming Like Christ: $20,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPark City Education Foundation: $3,555 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LILABEAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL SOJOURNS GIVING CIRCLE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST LED COMMUNITIES INC FORMERLY CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONCEPTS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHINING STARS SCHOOL: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anonymous Christian Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anonymous Christian Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anonymous Christian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home