Skip to content
Annette P Schmitt Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Annette P Schmitt Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$226kCrime & Legal$35kYouth Development$22kHousing & Shelter$19kRecreation & Sports$18kCommunity Improvement$15kArts & Culture$5kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$229k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Waypoint$12,500
CASA of New Hampshire$12,500
LACLT Inc dba LR Comnmunity Developers$10,000
Copper Cannon Corp$10,000
Pemi Youth Center$10,000
Lakes Region Santa Fund$5,000
New Beginnings$5,000
Boys & Girls Club of Central & Northern NH$5,000
Neighbors In Need$5,000
The Belknap House$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Community Caregivers of Greater Derry: $2k → 5%Easterseals New Hamphsire: $6k → 7%The Belknap House: $3k → 9%The Belknap House: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$303k · 9 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$303k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+6%

Still filing today

78%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W
    WAYPOINT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $200k · revenue +47%
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +13%
  • BH
    BRIGID'S HOUSE OF HOPE
    2× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • ES
    Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +23%
  • CG
    Community Gallery Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • NH
    New Hampshire Catholic Charities
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
CityHope of New Hampshire

CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…

Human Services
3
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Children's Law Center of New Hampshire

To provide legal representation and social services advocacy to new hampshire low-income and underserved children across multiple legal contexts.

Crime & Legal
5
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
6
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
7
Helping Hands Outreach Ministries Inc

Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.

Housing & Shelter
8
Building Community in New Hampshire

To be a multi-ethnic mutual assistance organization that provides an array of services required by diverse refugee and immigrant communities that help newcomers to understand and navigate the systems that are part of every day life.

Arts & Culture
9
New Beginnings Childrens Home

Provide a safe and therapeutic living environment for abused, neglected, and displaced children ages 5-17 by delivering services that transform lives and prepares for family reunification throught elements of love, hope and restoration.

Human Services
10
Headrest Inc

Headrest, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation that provides information and referral, crisis intervention and other related services through the uses of a telephone hotline and office visitations. Headrest also provides counseling and…

Health
11
Children's Advocacy Center of Hampshire County Inc

See schedule othe children's advocacy center of hampshire county (cac) provides a coordinated, culturally competent, multidisciplinary team response to allegations of child abuse in a dedicated, child-friendly setting. the cac brings…

Crime & Legal
12
New Generation Inc

We provide a safe, family-oriented shelter for homeless pregnant women and mothers with babies and children, helping to prepare and empower them to be successful in life.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Central and Northern Nh Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pemi Youth Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAYPOINT: $200,100 · Human ServicesWAYPOINT+4 more: $17,385 · Human Services+4 moreCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $35,000 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOIN…NEW BEGINNINGS WITHOUT VIOLENCE & ABUSE: $5,000 · Civil RightsNEW BEGINNIN…LACLT Inc dba LR Comnmunity Developers: $15,000 · OtherLACLT Inc dba …BRIGID'S HOUSE OF HOPE: $12,500 · OtherBRIGID'S HOUSE…Neighbors In Need: $5,500 · OtherNeighbors In N…LR Boys & Girls Club: $4,500 · OtherLR Boys & Girl…Boys & Girls Club of Ctrl NH: $2,500 · OtherBoys & Girls C…Back In The Saddle Equine Therapy Center: $2,500 · OtherBack In The Sa…+1 more: $1,000 · OtherCOPPER CANNON CORPORATION: $17,500 · Recreation & SportsPEMI YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LAKES REGION SANTA FUND 1380: $8,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Gallery Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMAKE-A-WISH OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$217,485Civil Rights$40,000Other$43,500Recreation & Sports$17,500Youth Development$15,000Philanthropy$8,000Arts & Culture$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAYPOINT: $200,100 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOPPER CANNON CORPORATION: $17,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBRIGID'S HOUSE OF HOPE: $12,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPEMI YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetTHE LAKES REGION SANTA FUND 1380: $8,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $5,885 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeighbors In Need: $5,500 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetCommunity Gallery Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS WITHOUT VIOLENCE & ABUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBelknap House: $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBack In The Saddle Equine Therapy Center: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Granite United WayCogswell Benevolent T…Greater Lakes Region …Agnes M Lindsay TrustM L Billings Tr FBO N…Trust Uw Oleonda Jame…Samuel P Hunt Foundat…Arthur Jr Dobles & Ol…Eastern Bank Foundati…Parker Nelson Foundat…Volunteer Nh
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH31× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Granite United Way · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Greater Lakes Region Charitable Fund for Children Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · M L Billings Tr FBO Nh Charities · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Eastern Bank Foundation · Parker Nelson Foundation · Volunteer Nh

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Annette P Schmitt Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Annette P Schmitt Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Annette P Schmitt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home