Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Annette & Martin Rosenzweig Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of ANNETTE & MARTIN ROSENZWEIG FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
$1,100
Median grant
3
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$43,300
BOCA WEST FOUNDATION$1,800
RUTH AND NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY$1,100
Individual grant recipient$200
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KAVOD: $180 → 12%BOCA WEST FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%BOCA WEST FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%BOCA WEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%BOCA WEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%BOCA WEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%BOCA WEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%BOCA WEST FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%BOCA WEST FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NV
SD
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$338k · 21 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
26

Total granted

$338k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+53%

Still filing today

48%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +69%
  • CY
    CONGREGATION YEMEI TESHUVA INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +38%
  • DK
    DONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +55%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SRVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $800

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
6
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

7
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
12
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Congregation Yemei Teshuva Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsClassical Music EnsemblesDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Community Health CentersCancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr15%24%20–35yr9%10%35–55yr12%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%40%10–20yr15%9%20–35yr9%3%35–55yr12%49%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,019

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $294,757 · OtherLEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER+33 more — $25,318 · Other+33 moreWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationDONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC — $2,180 · Education+1 more — $100 · EducationBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $15,100 · Human Services+2 more — $230 · Human ServicesCONGREGATION YEMEI TESHUVA INC — $3,727 · ReligionMOISHE HOUSE — $725 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $400 · Religion+1 more — $100 · ReligionJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $4,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING — $300 · Philanthropy+1 more — $100 · PhilanthropyBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,650 · InternationalSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $1,400 · Arts & Culture
Other$320,075Education$22,280Human Services$15,330Religion$4,952Philanthropy$4,400International$1,650Arts & Culture$1,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $15,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION YEMEI TESHUVA INC — $3,727 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetDONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC — $2,180 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE — $725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKAVOD — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CMA FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYNN UNIVERSITY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NIMLA TAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds CONGREGATION YEMEI TESHUVA INC
  • Who funds DONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds MOISHE HOUSE
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING
  • Who funds MACULAR DEGENERATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds KAVOD
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds THE CMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LYNN UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NIMLA TAL INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds B NAI B RITH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Annette & Martin Rosenzweig Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wesleyan University1% of income from government
  • Lynn University Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph