Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ann Piper Scholarship Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Education$157kHealth$2k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$891k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$12,500
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
WARTBURG COLLEGE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA$4,500
WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY$4,000
DRAKE UNIVERSITY$2,000
SIMPSON COLLEGE$2,000
INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,000
MERCY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SERVICES$2,000
CENTRAL COLLEGE$2,000
BUENA VISTA UNIVERSITY-OTTUMWA$2,000
LORAS COLLEGE$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 73% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SIMPSON COLLEGE: $3k → 6%WALDORF UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%BUENA VISTA UNIVERSITY-OTTUMWA: $3k → 16%BUENA VISTA UNIVERSITY-OTTUMWA: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$154k · 12 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$154k
$3k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $17k · revenue +338%
  • SC
    Simpson College
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +32%
  • CC
    COE COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $9k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • WU
    WALDORF UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
2
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
3
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
6
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
7
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
8
Centre College

Centre college is a small, independent, and selective educational community dedicated to study in the liberal arts as a means to develop the intellectual, personal, and moral potential of its students. centre nurtures in its students the…

Education
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
11
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
12
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loras College and the most unlike its peers is Coe College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF IOWA — $31,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWAIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY — $29,000 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITYINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $17,000 · OtherINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA — $12,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWABUENA VISTA UNIVERSITY-OTTUMWA — $5,000 · OtherLORAS COLLEGE — $4,500 · Other+1 more — $3,000 · OtherWARTBURG COLLEGE — $19,500 · EducationWARTBURG COLLEGESimpson College — $8,500 · EducationSimpson CollegeCOE COLLEGE — $8,500 · EducationCOE COLLEGECENTRAL COLLEGE — $8,000 · EducationCENTRAL COLLEGEWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY — $6,500 · EducationWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITYDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITYMERCY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $2,000 · Religion
Other$102,000Education$55,000Religion$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWARTBURG COLLEGE — $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $17,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetSimpson College — $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOE COLLEGE — $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COLLEGE — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLORAS COLLEGE — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WARTBURG COLLEGE
  • Who funds INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
  • Who funds Simpson College
  • Who funds COE COLLEGE
  • Who funds CENTRAL COLLEGE
  • Who funds WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LORAS COLLEGE
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MERCY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Moore Scholarship TrustWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moore Scholarship Trust · Fahrney Education Fdtn Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ann Piper Scholarship Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph