Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ann P Miller Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$481kHealth$336kHuman Services$38kCommunity Improvement$34kEducation$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kFood & Nutrition$500International$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $121k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$956k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION$30,500
ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION$30,000
DILWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$20,000
STANLY COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRY$15,500
MYERS PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,000
THE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE$10,000
PROJECT OUTPOUR$7,500
CROSSROADS CORPORATION$7,000
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEAL KIDS: $1k → 15%SEAL KIDS: $1k → 15%PROJECT OUTPOUR: $8k → 10%PROJECT OUTPOUR: $8k → 10%PROJECT OUTPOUR: $8k → 10%PROJECT OUTPOUR: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$844k · 13 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against -77% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$844k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
-77%

Still filing today

46%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $191k · revenue +65%
  • AH
    ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $144k · revenue +195%
  • PO
    PROJECT OUTPOUR
    4× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • FS
    FIRST STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • WN
    WESTERN NC CONFERENCE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • SC
    STANLY COUNTY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES CLOTHING CLOSET
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACTS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $160,000 · OtherACTS LEGACY FOUNDATIONPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA: $100,500 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USADILWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherDILWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCHSTANLY COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC: $57,000 · OtherSTANLY COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INCFIRST STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherFIRST STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCHCROSSROADS CORPORATION: $34,000 · OtherCROSSROADS CORPORATIONIndividual grant recipient: $22,000 · Other+10 more: $45,925 · Other+10 moreCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $190,850 · HealthCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSIONATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $143,500 · HealthATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATIONPROJECT OUTPOUR: $27,500 · Human ServicesSEALKIDS: $2,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS INC: $200 · International
Other$559,425Health$334,350Human Services$29,500International$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $190,850 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $143,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT OUTPOUR: $27,500 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetSEALKIDS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPresbyterian Samaritan Counseling Center: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFriendship Trays Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS INC: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT OUTPOUR ↗
  • Who funds SEALKIDS ↗
  • Who funds Presbyterian Samaritan Counseling Center ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Trays Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ann P Miller Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ann P Miller Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ann P Miller’s filings →

    More from the funding graph