Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ann McConahay Educational Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$74k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$29k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Ann McConahay Educational Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Greater Alliance Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Ann McConahay Educational Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $74k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’20
11
’21
10
’22
9
’23
8
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.5MEducation$400k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION$28,635
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$18,418
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
KENYON COLLEGE$3,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$3,000
BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY$2,500
YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
POMONA COLLEGE$2,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$2,000
MERCYHURST UNIVERSITY$2,000
WITTENBERG UNIVERSITY$2,000
OHIO UNIVERSITY$1,000
STARK STATE COLLEGE$1,000
WALSH UNIVERSITY$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KENYON COLLEGE: $3k → 12%GREATER ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 13%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 19%YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$389k · 19 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$389k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+10%

Still filing today

58%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Mount Union
    5× · 2020–2024 · $172k · revenue +36%
  • CA
    Clark Atlanta University Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $15k · revenue +40%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $9k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • MU
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SU
    SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +10%
  • MU
    MALONE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
5
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
6
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
7
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
8
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Board of Directors of Wittenberg College; the most unlike its peers is Greater Alliance Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $1,466,659 · PhilanthropyGREATER ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INCUniversity of Mount Union: $171,672 · EducationUniversity of M…Clark Atlanta University Inc: $15,000 · EducationClark Atlanta U…LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $9,000 · EducationWalsh University Inc: $8,707 · Education+9 more: $45,000 · Education+9 moreOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $65,764 · OtherOHIO STAT…KENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $36,701 · OtherKENT STAT…COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherCOASTAL C…TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $9,139 · OtherTRUSTEES …BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · OtherSTARK STATE COLLEGE: $5,500 · Other+5 more: $15,250 · Other+5 more
Philanthropy$1,466,659Education$249,379Other$150,354

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $1,466,659 over 1y, 35% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $171,672 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $9,139 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $8,707 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIRAM COLLEGE: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE ERIE COLLEGE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHeidelberg University: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
  • Who funds Clark Atlanta University Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
  • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Baldwin Wallace University ↗
  • Who funds HIRAM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Heidelberg University ↗
  • Who funds KENYON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC14.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charles Elmer Scholarship Fund · Ella Weiss Educational Fund · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ann McConahay Educational Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ann McConahay Educational Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ann McConahay Educational Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ann McConahay Educational Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ann McConahay Educational’s filings →

More from the funding graph