Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ann & Leo Stoll Jr Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$55kRecreation & Sports$39kHuman Services$34kArts & Culture$27kPublic Benefit$12kCommunity Improvement$10kHealth$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$514k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLATTEVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$6,000
FRIENDS OF POTOSI WI INC$4,200
PLATTEVILLE HOLIDAY PROJECT$3,000
CLARITY CLINIC$2,800
SOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER$2,500
INSPIRING COMMUNITY INC$2,000
HICKORY HILL PARK FOUNDATION INC$2,000
LAURA BARTELS ODESSA COLLEGE$1,500
COURTNEY TYSON UW PLATTEVILLE$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,300
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE GRANT CO$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGENOAH RHODEN: $2k → 16%SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE GRANT CO: $3k → 11%U OF MINNESOTA-TWIN CITIESGARRISON TASHNER: $2k → 11%CESA 3: $4k → 13%INSPIRING COMMUNITY INC: $7k → 13%PLATTEVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $6k → 13%PLATTEVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $6k → 13%PLATTEVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 13%FAMILY CONNECTIONS OF SW WISCONSIN: $5k → 13%JAMISON MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $5k → 13%PLATTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $4k → 13%FAMILY CONNECTIONS OF SW WISCONSIN: $3k → 13%PLATTEVILLE THRIFT SHOP: $3k → 13%PLATTEVILLE HOLIDAY PROJECT: $3k → 13%CLARITY CLINIC: $3k → 13%SOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER: $3k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF GRANT COUNTY: $3k → 13%PLATTEVILLE HOLIDAY PROJECT: $3k → 13%PLATTEVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 13%SOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER: $3k → 13%CONCERNED CHURCH WOMEN OF PLATTEVILLE INC: $3k → 13%FRIENDS OF BRICKL MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $2k → 13%INSPIRING COMMUNITY INC: $2k → 13%INSPIRING COMMUNITY INC: $2k → 13%JAMISON MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF GRANT COUNTY: $2k → 13%GRANT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $9k → 13%DICKEYVILLE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 13%BRICKL MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $3k → 13%HOLY GHOST-IMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL: $2k → 13%HOLY GHOST-IMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL: $2k → 13%FRIENDS OF BRICKL MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $2k → 13%FRIENDS OF BRICKL MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $2k → 13%POTOSI HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 13%POTOSI VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $9k → 13%ST ANDREW-THOMAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $7k → 13%POTOSI ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $6k → 13%VILLAGE OF POTOSI: $6k → 13%POTOSI FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 13%ST ANDREW-THOMAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $5k → 13%ST ANDREWTHOMAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $5k → 13%POTOSI FINE ARTS CLUB: $5k → 13%FRIENDS OF POTOSI WI INC: $4k → 13%PASSAGE THRU TIME MUSEUM: $4k → 13%ST ANDREW-THOMAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $4k → 13%ABA MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 13%ST ANDREW-THOMAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $2k → 13%HICKORY HILL PARK FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$113k · 12 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +71% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
29

Total granted

$113k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+71%

Still filing today

42%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INSPIRING COMMUNTY INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +195%
  • PT
    PLATTEVILLE THRIFT SHOP INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $8k · revenue +70%
  • JM
    JAMISON MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $7k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • DP
    Dickeyville Park Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -49%
  • GC
    GRANT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • PH
    POTOSI HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pottawatomie County Historical Society

Celebrate and honor the historic traditions, innovation and creativity of the people of pottawatomie county through responsible collection, preservation, and exhibition from a publicly accessible museum of historical artifacts.

—
2
Postville Volunteer Fire Department

Raise funds for Frontier Fire Department

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Potawatomi Park Inc
—
4
Poweshiek County Fair Foundation
Recreation & Sports
5
Paynesville Historical Society

To preserve the history for the town of paynesville, minnesota

—
6
Potter County Historical Society
—
7
Platteville Library Foundation Inc
—
8
Pewee Valley Fire District Foundation Incorporated
Public Safety & Disaster
9
Portage Service Club Association

The combined local mission of the portage service club association is to create, select and support portage community projects as a group, in order to increase civic recognition, and thereby increase membership in the different service…

Recreation & Sports
10
Pocahontas Community Foundation

Development of agricultural, educational and scientific programs and facilities in pocahontas, iowa

—
11
Madison County Historical Society
Arts & Culture
12
Pottawattamie County Housing Trust Fund Inc

To be an advocate for actions that provide quality housing opportunities for pottawattamie county residents in need of supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspiring Communty Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dickeyville Park Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANDREW-THOMAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $22,600 · OtherST ANDREW-THOMAS CATHOLIC SCHOOLPLATTEVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $19,700 · OtherPLATTEVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHFAMILY CONNECTIONS OF SW WISCONSIN: $9,600 · OtherFAMILY CONNECTIONS OF SW WISCONSINPOTOSI HIGH SCHOOL: $9,000 · OtherPLATTEVILLE THRIFT SHOP INC: $8,250 · OtherFRIENDS OF BRICKL MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $8,200 · OtherJAMISON MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherPOTOSI ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $6,000 · OtherSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE GRANT CO: $5,900 · Other+31 more: $73,950 · Other+31 moreINSPIRING COMMUNTY INC: $11,000 · PhilanthropyDickeyville Park Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsGRANT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,000 · AnimalsPOTOSI VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT IN: $9,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPOTOSI FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,300 · Health
Other$176,200Philanthropy$11,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Animals$9,000Public Safety & Disaster$9,000Arts & Culture$6,000Health$5,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSPIRING COMMUNTY INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDickeyville Park Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetPOTOSI VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT IN: $9,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetPLATTEVILLE THRIFT SHOP INC: $8,250 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetJAMISON MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetPOTOSI FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRANT COUNTY INC: $4,400 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PLATTEVILLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $800 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSPIRING COMMUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Dickeyville Park Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRANT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds POTOSI VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT IN ↗
  • Who funds PLATTEVILLE THRIFT SHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMISON MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds POTOSI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds POTOSI FINE ARTS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRANT COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fritz Family Foundation IncWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fritz Family Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ann & Leo Stoll Jr Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ann & Leo Stoll Jr Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ann & Leo Stoll Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph