· Private foundation
Ann & Leo Stoll Jr Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLATTEVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $6,000 |
| FRIENDS OF POTOSI WI INC | $4,200 |
| PLATTEVILLE HOLIDAY PROJECT | $3,000 |
| CLARITY CLINIC | $2,800 |
| SOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER | $2,500 |
| HICKORY HILL PARK FOUNDATION INC | $2,000 |
| INSPIRING COMMUNITY INC | $2,000 |
| LAURA BARTELS ODESSA COLLEGE | $1,500 |
| COURTNEY TYSON UW PLATTEVILLE | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,300 |
| SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE GRANT CO | $1,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +85% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ICINSPIRING COMMUNTY INC3× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +195%
- PTPLATTEVILLE THRIFT SHOP INC4× · 2019–2022 · $8k · revenue +70%
- JMJAMISON MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2019–2021 · $7k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- DPDickeyville Park Foundation Incone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -49%
- GCGRANT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INCone grant, 2023 · $9k
- PHPOTOSI HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Celebrate and honor the historic traditions, innovation and creativity of the people of pottawatomie county through responsible collection, preservation, and exhibition from a publicly accessible museum of historical artifacts.
Raise funds for Frontier Fire Department
To preserve the history for the town of paynesville, minnesota
The combined local mission of the portage service club association is to create, select and support portage community projects as a group, in order to increase civic recognition, and thereby increase membership in the different service…
Development of agricultural, educational and scientific programs and facilities in pocahontas, iowa
To be an advocate for actions that provide quality housing opportunities for pottawattamie county residents in need of supportive services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspiring Communty Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dickeyville Park Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INSPIRING COMMUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Dickeyville Park Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GRANT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds POTOSI VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT IN ↗
- Who funds PLATTEVILLE THRIFT SHOP INC ↗
- Who funds JAMISON MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds POTOSI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds POTOSI FINE ARTS CLUB ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRANT COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fritz Family Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ann & Leo Stoll Jr Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.