Skip to content
Anmed Health at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Anmed Health

The mission of AnMed is to provide exceptional and compassionate care to all we serve.

$444k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$2.6MPhilanthropy$1.9MHealth$253kHuman Services$200kEducation$173kCommunity Improvement$97kEnvironment$50kHousing & Shelter$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PlaySafe$250,000
Anderson University$52,796
Anderson Free Clinic$23,000
United Way of Anderson County$19,041
Cancer Association of Anderson$13,000
Clemson University$11,000
Clemson Area Chamber of Commerce$10,500
YMCA of Easley Pickens & Powdersville$10,000
Ten at the Top$10,000
Connect Powdersville$10,000
Anderson Area YMCA$6,600
City of Anderson$6,500
Anderson Aviation Association$6,000
Brett Crowe Memorial Golf Tournament$5,250
Tri County Technical College$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANDERSON AREA YMCA: $127k → 15%Anderson Area YMCA: $7k → 15%ANDERSON AREA YMCA: $6k → 15%Anderson Area YMCA: $6k → 15%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 15%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 15%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 15%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 15%Westside Community Center: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 14 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$4.6M
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-14%

Still filing today

93%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    PLAYSAFE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +52% · 43% of their budget
  • AU
    ANDERSON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $180k · revenue +74%
  • CA
    CANCER ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON
    8× · 2017–2024 · $92k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • AS
    ANDERSON SCHOOL DISTRICT 4
    one grant, 2021 · $70k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE GREEN CRESCENT
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -95%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Anderson Foundation
—
2
Anderson Group Community Foundation
Community Improvement
3
The Anderson Foundation
—
4
Myrtle Beach Area Chamber of Commerce Educational Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The David & Colleen Anderson Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Anderson Family Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

—
8
Anderson County Chamber of Commerce Inc

The Anderson County Chamber of Commerces mission is to advance the general welfare of Anderson County so that its citizens, its businesses, its education community and its local government shall prosper.

Community Improvement
9
John W Anderson Foundation
—
10
The Anderson Foundation Inc
—
11
Anderson Twp Historical Society Inc
—
12
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City of Anderson Public Facilities Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Brett Crowe Memorial. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLAYSAFE: $2,477,029 · Recreation & SportsPLAYSAFEUNITED WAY OF ANDERSON COUNTY: $1,370,253 · OtherUNITED WAY OF ANDERSON COUNTYANDERSON SCHOOL DISTRICT 4: $70,000 · Other+14 more: $189,075 · Other+14 moreFoothills Community Foundation: $500,000 · PhilanthropyFoothills …+1 more: $6,000 · PhilanthropyANDERSON FREE CLINIC: $161,000 · HealthCANCER ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON: $91,600 · HealthANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $180,296 · EducationCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $26,000 · EducationYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON SOUTH CAROLINA: $144,800 · Human ServicesTHE WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE GREEN CRESCENT: $50,000 · Environment
Recreation & Sports$2,477,029Other$1,629,328Philanthropy$506,000Health$252,600Education$206,296Human Services$199,800Environment$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLAYSAFE: $2,477,029 over 8y, 43% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ANDERSON COUNTY: $1,370,253 over 8y, 10% of budgetFoothills Community Foundation: $500,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $180,296 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANDERSON FREE CLINIC: $161,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON SOUTH CAROLINA: $144,800 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCANCER ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON: $91,600 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetTHE WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $55,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ANDERSON INC: $40,400 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCLEMSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $39,925 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEN AT THE TOP: $15,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetAnderson Area Chamber of Commerce Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBRETT CROWE MEMORIAL: $10,250 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetINNOVATE ANDERSON: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetANDERSON COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL: $9,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCITY OF ANDERSON PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION: $6,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetANDERSON AVIATION ASSOCIATION CHARITABLE FUND: $6,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetANDERSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBELTON TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Duke Energy FoundationNC11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anmed Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anmed Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anmed Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home