Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Anmed Health

The mission of AnMed is to provide exceptional and compassionate care to all we serve.

$444k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$2.6MPhilanthropy$1.9MHealth$253kHuman Services$200kEducation$173kCommunity Improvement$97kEnvironment$50kHousing & Shelter$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PlaySafe$250,000
Anderson University$52,796
Anderson Free Clinic$23,000
United Way of Anderson County$19,041
Cancer Association of Anderson$13,000
Clemson University$11,000
Clemson Area Chamber of Commerce$10,500
Connect Powdersville$10,000
YMCA of Easley Pickens & Powdersville$10,000
Ten at the Top$10,000
Anderson Area YMCA$6,600
City of Anderson$6,500
Anderson Aviation Association$6,000
Brett Crowe Memorial Golf Tournament$5,250
Tri County Technical College$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANDERSON AREA YMCA: $127k → 15%Anderson Area YMCA: $7k → 15%ANDERSON AREA YMCA: $6k → 15%Anderson Area YMCA: $6k → 15%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 15%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 15%Westside Community Center: $5k → 15%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 15%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 14 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$4.6M
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-14%

Still filing today

93%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    PLAYSAFE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +52% · 43% of their budget
  • AU
    ANDERSON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $180k · revenue +74%
  • CA
    CANCER ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON
    8× · 2017–2024 · $92k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • AS
    ANDERSON SCHOOL DISTRICT 4
    one grant, 2021 · $70k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE GREEN CRESCENT
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -95%
  • IA
    INNOVATE ANDERSON
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -68%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Anderson Foundation
2
Anderson Group Community Foundation
Community Improvement
3
The Anderson Foundation
4
Myrtle Beach Area Chamber of Commerce Educational Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The David & Colleen Anderson Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Anderson Family Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

8
Anderson County Chamber of Commerce Inc

The Anderson County Chamber of Commerces mission is to advance the general welfare of Anderson County so that its citizens, its businesses, its education community and its local government shall prosper.

Community Improvement
9
John W Anderson Foundation
10
The Anderson Foundation Inc
11
Anderson Twp Historical Society Inc
12
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City of Anderson Public Facilities Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Brett Crowe Memorial. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLAYSAFE — $2,477,029 · Recreation & SportsPLAYSAFEUNITED WAY OF ANDERSON COUNTY — $1,370,253 · OtherUNITED WAY OF ANDERSON COUNTYANDERSON SCHOOL DISTRICT 4 — $70,000 · Other+14 more — $189,075 · Other+14 moreFoothills Community Foundation — $500,000 · PhilanthropyFoothills …+1 more — $6,000 · PhilanthropyANDERSON FREE CLINIC — $161,000 · HealthCANCER ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON — $91,600 · HealthANDERSON UNIVERSITY — $180,296 · EducationCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $26,000 · EducationYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON SOUTH CAROLINA — $144,800 · Human ServicesTHE WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE GREEN CRESCENT — $50,000 · Environment
Recreation & Sports$2,477,029Other$1,629,328Philanthropy$506,000Health$252,600Education$206,296Human Services$199,800Environment$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLAYSAFE — $2,477,029 over 8y, 43% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ANDERSON COUNTY — $1,370,253 over 8y, 10% of budgetFoothills Community Foundation — $500,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY — $180,296 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANDERSON FREE CLINIC — $161,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON SOUTH CAROLINA — $144,800 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCANCER ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON — $91,600 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetTHE WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $55,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ANDERSON INC — $40,400 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCLEMSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $39,925 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEN AT THE TOP — $15,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetAnderson Area Chamber of Commerce Inc — $11,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBRETT CROWE MEMORIAL — $10,250 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetINNOVATE ANDERSON — $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetANDERSON COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL — $9,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCITY OF ANDERSON PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION — $6,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetANDERSON AVIATION ASSOCIATION CHARITABLE FUND — $6,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetANDERSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBELTON TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anmed Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph