· Private foundation
Anita Mann Kohl Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALS OF NEVADA | $15,000 |
| LA DANCE CHRONICLE | $10,000 |
| ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND | $7,500 |
| FAIRFAX HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSN | $5,240 |
| ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND | $5,000 |
| LUMINARIO BALLET OF LOS ANGELES | $5,000 |
| DANCE AND DIALOGUE | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| CHLOE AND MAUD FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| THE NEW SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE | $2,500 |
| OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION | $2,250 |
| CONGA KIDS | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| SPEEDWAY CHILDREN'S CHARITIES | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LBLuminario Ballet Of Los Angeles3× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +29%
- JJJacob Jonas The Company Inc6× · 2017–2023 · $22k · revenue +260%
- DADANCE AND DIALOGUE2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- NDNEVADA DONOR NETWORK FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -76%
- DDDIAVOLO DANCE THEATREone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +10%
- FSFORGOTTEN SONG FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Dance Film SF DFSF brings dance to wider audiences through the presentation and development of dance-based films. We celebrate the best dance films from around the world, encourage and assist choreographers and filmmakers in the creation…
Move|nyc| is a civic arts and social justice organization committed to cultivating a more diverse and inclusive society through transforming the field of professional dance. more than an arts organization, move|nyc| is a movement for…
Alvin ailey dance foundation's mission is to further the pioneering vision of the choreographer, dancer, and cultural leader alvin ailey by building an extended cultural community which provides dance performances, training and education,…
Sf ballet's mission is to shape ballet's future by creating works of (see sch. o) uncompromising excellence, identifying and developing extraordinary talent, and serving as a catalys for cultural transformation. we blend innovation with…
Balletx expands the vocabulary of contemporary ballet for all audiences through innovative performances, world premiere choreography, dance education, and community programs.
The performance art museum (pam) is the first u.s. institution exclusively dedicated to the presentation and preservation of live art. our mission is to facilitate the powerful impact of live experiences that can profoundly transform our…
To preserve, promote, and present the art of ballet and dance through performances, education, and community outreach, making high-quality cultural experiences accessible to diverse audiences.
Creation, teaching and performance of contemporary dance
Form 990, part 1, line 1 - organization mission and significant activities the mission of dance now miami is to promote the artistic vision of co- founders hannah baumgarten and diego salterini. the company creates, promotes and produces…
The purposes of the corporation are to introduce and foster the arts into the experience, participation and knowledge of children using dance as a catalyst; promote the belief that the arts are primary and vital in our society and should…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Actors' Fund of America and the most unlike its peers is David L Lebowitz Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Luminario Ballet Of Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds Jacob Jonas The Company Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds NEVADA DONOR NETWORK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIAVOLO DANCE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds ALS UNITED NEVADA ↗
- Who funds MGM RESORTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA DANCE CHRONICLE ↗
- Who funds American Dance Movement ↗
- Who funds WOMEN HELPING YOUTH ↗
- Who funds DANCE AND DIALOGUE ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds FAIRFAX HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DAVID L LEBOWITZ FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Complexions Foundation ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds The New School ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds BODY TRAFFIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Allen and Anita Kohl Charitable Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Windsong Trust · Canarelli Family Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · United Way of Southern Nevada · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · Mgm Resorts Foundation · California Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anita Mann Kohl Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Dance Education Organization — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Anita Mann Kohl Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Anita Mann Kohl Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.