Skip to content

· Private foundation

Animal Relief Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$452kHuman Services$31kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,808
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$7,808
NOAH'S ARK FOUNDATION INC$7,808
HOOVES & PAWS RESCUE OF THE HEARTLAND$7,808
IOWA EQUINE RESCUE AND$7,808
PEOPLE FOR PETS$7,808
C & W'S RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC$7,808
HEALING HEARTS WITH HORSES$7,808
HEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY$7,808
DES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$7,808
IOWA HUMANE ALLIANCE$5,000
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA$3,610
HERO'S HAVEN ANIMAL RESCUE$3,500
JOHNSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$3,000
FOR PETS SAKE INC$2,500
SAFE HAVEN OF IOWA COUNTY$2,070
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JOHNSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 11%C & W'S RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC: $10k → 8%HOOVES & PAWS RESCUE OF THE HEARTLAND IN: $12k → 9%PAWS AND MORE ANIMAL SHELTER: $13k → 9%PEOPLE FOR PETS: $8k → 9%WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $13k → 10%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA: $4k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOWA: $16k → 13%NOAH'S ARK FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 14%DES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $18k → 15%HERO'S HAVEN ANIMAL RESCUE: $12k → 15%HEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY LTD: $10k → 16%C & W'S RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC: $8k → 8%HOOVES & PAWS RESCUE OF THE HEARTLAND: $8k → 9%IOWA HUMANE ALLIANCE: $5k → 9%WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $11k → 10%HEALING HEARTS WITH HORSES: $11k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH: $3k → 13%NOAH'S ARK FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 14%DES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 15%HERO'S HAVEN ANIMAL RESCUE: $4k → 15%HEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY LTD: $5k → 16%C & W'S RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC: $5k → 8%HOOVES & PAWS RESCUE OF THE HEARTLAND: $6k → 9%IOWA HUMANE ALLIANCE: $4k → 9%WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 10%NOAH'S ARK FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 14%DES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $8k → 15%HEROS HAVEN ANIMAL RESCUE: $4k → 15%HEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY LTD: $5k → 16%C & W'S RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC: $3k → 8%IOWA HUMANE ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE: $8k → 10%HEALING HEARTS WITH HORSES: $8k → 10%NOAH'S ARK FOUNDATION INC: $7k → 14%DES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $8k → 15%HERO'S HAVEN ANIMAL RESCUE: $3k → 15%HEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY LTD: $4k → 16%C & W'S RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC: $3k → 8%IOWA HUMANE ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $8k → 10%NOAH'S ARK FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%DES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $7k → 15%C & W'S RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC: $3k → 8%HEALING HEARTS WITH HORSES: $6k → 10%NOAH'S ARK FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 14%DES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 15%HEALING HEARTS WITH HORSES: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$454k · 18 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$454k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
0%

Still filing today

67%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +136%
  • DM
    DES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $56k · revenue +106%
  • NA
    Noahs Ark Foundation Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $43k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOW
    one grant, 2024 · $16k · revenue 0%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL CENTER FDTN
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • AR
    ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INCORPORATE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
2
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
3
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
4
Mineral County Humane Society Inc

rescue-spay-neuter and adopt into forever homes

Animals
5
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
6
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
7
St Clair County Humane Society

Maintain and care for incoming animals.

Animals
8
Van Wert County Humane Society Inc

The van wert county humane society is committed to building a community of responsible pet owners and ending animal cruelty; to offering a safe haven for animals in need; and to attempt through all reasonable avenues to return animals to…

Animals
9
Heartland Humane Society of Missouri

Heartland Humane Society of Missouri is a 501 c3 non profit group of dedicated foster homes that gives abandoned abused and unwanted animals another chance for loving permanent homes through our adoption program following the no-kill…

Animals
10
Pleasants County Humane Society Inc

Shelter & loving care for strays

Recreation & Sports
11
Humane Society of Central Illinois

HSCIs mission is to find loving, forever homes for abused and unwanted pets.

Animals
12
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington County Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Muscatine Center for Social Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $56,220 · AnimalsDES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYNoahs Ark Foundation Inc: $42,788 · AnimalsNoahs Ark Foundation IncHEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY LTD: $27,307 · AnimalsHEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY LTDHooves & Paws Rescue Of The Heartland: $25,394 · AnimalsHooves & Paws Rescue Of The HeartlandIOWA HUMANE ALLIANCE: $23,575 · AnimalsIOWA HUMANE ALLIANCEHEROS HAVEN ANIMAL RESCUE: $22,050 · AnimalsHEROS HAVEN ANIMAL RESCUEPEOPLE FOR PETS: $18,308 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR PETSHUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOW: $16,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOWSAFE HAVEN OF IOWA COUNTY: $11,570 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $10,545 · AnimalsANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INC: $9,333 · Animals+1 more: $7,808 · AnimalsWASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $67,541 · OtherWASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYIOWA EQUINE RESCUE AND: $31,698 · OtherIOWA EQUINE RESCUE ANDHEALING HEARTS WITH HORSES: $30,976 · OtherHEALING HEARTS WITH HORSESJOHNSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $15,408 · OtherJOHNSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INCFOR PETS SAKE INC: $13,500 · OtherFOR PETS SAKE INC+8 more: $18,900 · Other+8 moreC & Ws RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC: $36,998 · PhilanthropyMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $6,000 · Community Improvement
Animals$270,898Other$178,023Philanthropy$36,998Community Improvement$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $67,541 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetDES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $56,220 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetNoahs Ark Foundation Inc: $42,788 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetC & Ws RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC: $36,998 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetHEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY LTD: $27,307 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetHooves & Paws Rescue Of The Heartland: $25,394 over 3y, 12% of budgetIOWA HUMANE ALLIANCE: $23,575 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHEROS HAVEN ANIMAL RESCUE: $22,050 over 4y, 13% of budgetPEOPLE FOR PETS: $18,308 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOW: $16,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSAFE HAVEN OF IOWA COUNTY: $11,570 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $10,545 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INC: $9,333 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,808 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DES MOINES COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Noahs Ark Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds C & Ws RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY LTD ↗
  • Who funds Hooves & Paws Rescue Of The Heartland ↗
  • Who funds IOWA HUMANE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HEROS HAVEN ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR PETS ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL IOW ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN OF IOWA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI18.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The Miccio Foundation · Animal Resource Foundation of Iowa Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Animal Relief Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Animal Relief Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Animal Relief’s filings →

    More from the funding graph