Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Angus Held Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$213kRecreation & Sports$135kHealth$53kEducation$32kEmployment$30kInternational$30kPhilanthropy$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mountain Pet Rescue$60,000
Soccer Without Borders$10,000
LOLA's Rescue$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Soccer Without Borders: $25k → 8%International Rescue Committee: $25k → 12%The Power of One Foundation: $10k → 10%Paws of War: $5k → 7%Two Wheels for Life: $3k → 17%LOLA's Rescue: $5k → 7%Mountain Pet Rescue: $60k → 7%Moms and Mutts Colorado Rescue: $25k → 8%Pride Soccer Club: $20k → 9%Rocky Mountain Immigration Advocacy: $3k → 10%African Community Center Denver: $3k → 12%Riders for Health: $20k → 14%Soccer Without Borders: $15k → 8%The Power of One Foundation: $10k → 10%Mountain Pet Rescue: $25k → 7%Moms and Mutts Colorado Rescue: $8k → 8%University of Colorado - CS Womens Socc: $15k → 9%African Community Advancement Initiative: $3k → 12%Riders for Health: $15k → 14%Soccer Without Borders: $12k → 8%The Power of One Foundation: $5k → 10%Mountain Pet Rescue: $25k → 7%Moms and Mutts Colorado Rescue: $5k → 8%University of Colorado - CS Womens Socc: $14k → 9%African Community Advancement Initiative: $2k → 12%Riders for Health: $10k → 14%Soccer Without Borders: $10k → 8%The Power of One Foundation: $5k → 10%Mountain Pet Rescue: $15k → 7%Colorado Pride Soccer Club: $10k → 9%Riders for Health: $5k → 14%Soccer Without Borders: $10k → 8%Mountain Pet Rescue: $13k → 7%Colorado Pride Soccer Club: $10k → 9%Soccer Without Borders: $5k → 8%Mountain Pet Rescue: $10k → 7%Pride Soccer Club: $8k → 9%Soccer Without Borders: $5k → 8%Mountain Pet Rescue: $10k → 7%Colorado Pride Soccer Club: $5k → 9%Mountain Pet Rescue: $7k → 7%Doherty High School: $3k → 9%The Grand Foundation: $5k → 7%Grand County Search & Rescue: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$451k · 9 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$451k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+48%

Still filing today

44%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MOUNTAIN PET RESCUE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +65%
  • SW
    SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS
    7× · 2018–2025 · $82k · revenue +235%
  • EP
    El Paso Pride Soccer Association
    2× · 2017–2018 · $28k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -4%
  • PO
    PAWS OF WAR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +48%
  • GC
    GRAND COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Black Ops Rescue

Transforming the lives of shelter pets and veterans through compassionate assessment, compatible adoptions, and ongoing support.

Animals
2
Rainbow Rescues
3
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
4
Front Range German Shepherd Rescue Inc

Rescues dogs, rehomes German shepherds, and provides medical and shelter care.

Animals
5
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
6
Great Pyrenees Rescue Society Inc

Great Pyrenees Rescue Society Inc. is an all volunteer non profit organization dedicated to the rescue and adoption of Great Pyrenees dogs and mixes whose lives are considered in danger. The dogs we take care of are owner surrender strays…

Animals
7
Rocky Mountain Puppy Rescue

Rocky Mountain Puppy Rescue is a group of hardworking fosters and volunteers who work to save the lives of unwanted dogs and puppies around the Colorado area. We focus on the younger animals that, when dumped in a shelter, are often…

Animals
8
Animal Rescuers Without Borders

Battling against the overpopulation of homeless pets and improving the lives of companion animals through rescue, fostering programs, adoption, pet care, educational programs and of course spaying and neutering.

Animals
9
Lucky Day Animal Rescue of Colorado

Lucky Day Animal Rescue of Colorado LDAR serves the public as a 501c3 tax exempt, non-profit organization dedicated to the rescue of homeless and abandoned animals in Colorado and surrounding areas. We rescue, rehabilitate and find homes…

Animals
10
High Sierra Animal Rescue Inc

High Sierra Animal Rescues mission is to save the lives of homeless dogs in the regions served. Our staff and volunteers are dedicated to making our communities better through successful adoptions advancing their welfare and creating human…

Animals
11
Colorado Puppy Rescue of Colorado

Animal Rescue and Adoption

Animals
12
A Better Chance International Rescue

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Paso Pride Soccer Association and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MOUNTAIN PET RESCUE — $164,500 · AnimalsMOUNTAIN PET RESCUE+2 more — $10,000 · Animals+2 moreRiders for Health — $50,000 · OtherRiders for HealthMoms and Mutts Colorado Rescue — $38,000 · OtherMoms and Mutts Colorado RescueUniversity of Colorado - CS Womens Socc — $29,000 · OtherUniversity of Colorado - CS Womens …Colorado Pride Soccer Club — $25,000 · OtherColorado Pride Soccer Club+5 more — $16,000 · Other+5 moreSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS — $81,750 · Recreation & SportsSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERSEl Paso Pride Soccer Association — $28,145 · Recreation & SportsEl Paso Pride Soccer Ass…Power of One Foundation — $30,000 · Food & NutritionInternational Rescue Committee INC — $25,000 · InternationalGRAND COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUE — $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterColumbine Community Foundation — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$174,500Other$158,000Recreation & Sports$109,895Food & Nutrition$30,000International$25,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOUNTAIN PET RESCUE — $164,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS — $81,750 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetPower of One Foundation — $30,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetEl Paso Pride Soccer Association — $28,145 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS OF WAR INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUE — $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetColumbine Community Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOUNTAIN PET RESCUE
  • Who funds SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS
  • Who funds Power of One Foundation
  • Who funds El Paso Pride Soccer Association
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds PAWS OF WAR INC
  • Who funds GRAND COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUE
  • Who funds LOLAS RESCUE
  • Who funds Columbine Community Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Angus Held Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph