Skip to content
Andrew W and Kathryn D Moock Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Andrew W and Kathryn D Moock Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$650k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$577k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$947kHuman Services$347kRecreation & Sports$310kReligion$280kHousing & Shelter$95kCommunity Improvement$73kHealth$50kYouth Development$46kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $250k+1 grant · $577k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATION FUND$576,600
SWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE AND FOOD FES$30,000
WITAN CORP$25,000
THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA$6,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$5,000
THE KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$5,000
ST PAUL GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCHINC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 9 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$1.9M
$292k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+42%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CLEARVIEW LEGACY FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION PRESERVATION & RESEARCH
    3× · 2020–2023 · $310k · revenue +517%
  • HH
    HARMONY HOUSE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $85k · revenue +87%
  • WC
    WITAN Corp
    3× · 2022–2024 · $73k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • IC
    IGLESIA CRISTIANA HISPANA LUTHERAN
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • RC
    REDEEMER CRISIS CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • SC
    SHELTER CARE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Choices for Victims of Domestic Violence

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
2
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
3
Safe Children Coalition Inc

The safe children coalition's mission is to protect children and youth, strengthen families, and build community.

Human Services
4
Youth Haven Inc

Providing home, hope and healing to abused and neglected children and teens in southwest florida.

Human Services
5
Caring for Kids Inc

Caring for kids, inc. (cfk) is a private, non-profit, full-service adoption and foster care agency operating since 1995. cfk specializes in diverse and inclusive birth parent, foster care, adoption and behavioral health services. our…

Human Services
6
Focus On Youth Inc

Improve lives by providing trauma-responsive foster care, adoption, and behavioral health services that promote permanency, safety, and well-being for youth and families.

Human Services
7
Shriners Hospital for Children
Philanthropy
8
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—
9
The First Step Home Inc

To create compassionate pathways for women's addiction recovery through an integrated continuum of services to achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
10
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
11
The Homeless Families Foundation

The homeless families foundation educates and nurtures children while empowering families to achieve stable housing and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
12
The Wichita Children's Home

To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Witan Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATION FUND: $776,600 · OtherNAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATION FUNDOASIS OUTREACH FOUNDATION: $275,000 · OtherOASIS OUTREACH FOUNDATIONIGLESIA CRISTIANA HISPANA LUTHERAN: $150,000 · OtherIGLESIA CRISTIANA HISPANA LUTHERANCITIZENS AKRON CHURCH: $110,000 · OtherCITIZENS AKRON CHURCHREDEEMER CRISIS CENTER: $50,000 · Other+9 more: $59,500 · OtherCLEARVIEW LEGACY FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION PRESERVATION & RESEARCH: $310,000 · EducationCLEARVIEW LEGACY FOUNDAT…FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS: $170,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH …HARMONY HOUSE INC: $85,000 · Housing & ShelterST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterWITAN Corp: $72,500 · Community ImprovementSHELTER CARE INC: $50,000 · HealthPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $21,500 · HealthFIRST GLANCE STUDENT CENTER INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentSWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FEST: $30,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,421,100Education$480,000Housing & Shelter$95,000Community Improvement$72,500Health$71,500Youth Development$40,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEARVIEW LEGACY FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION PRESERVATION & RESEARCH: $310,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS: $170,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHARMONY HOUSE INC: $85,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetWITAN Corp: $72,500 over 3y, 18% of budgetSHELTER CARE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFIRST GLANCE STUDENT CENTER INC: $40,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetSWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FEST: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $21,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWhispering Grace Horses: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community Found…Christ FoundationNorthern Ohio Golf Ch…Stark Community Found…American Endowment Fo…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Akron Community FoundationOH17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Christ Foundation · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc · Stark Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Andrew W and Kathryn D Moock Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Andrew W and Kathryn D Moock Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Andrew W and Kathryn D Moock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home