Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$250,000
States reached, FY2025
3
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Public Benefit$250kEducation$110kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$5kReligion$52

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
First Baptist Church$250,0001n/a
Alliance for Choice in Education$110,00020%
American Values$10,00011%
Lifesavers Foundation$5,0001n/a
Prestonwood Baptist Church$521n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation

How much does Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation give?
Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $275,052 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (67%), Education (29%), Arts & Culture (3%).
Who are Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2025: First Baptist Church ($250k), Alliance for Choice in Education ($110k), American Values ($10k).
Does Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation based?
Andrew and Joan Horner Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Andrew and Joan Horner’s filings →

More from the funding graph