Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anderson Bluhm Freedom Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$15kReligion$14kInternational$11kFood & Nutrition$5kCrime & Legal$5kYouth Development$2kEducation$2kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$145k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIRK IN THE HILLS CHURCH$8,140
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$2,000
CARE HOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY$1,000
BRIDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH$500
SANCTUM HOUSE$250
CHURCH WORLD SERVICE CROP$75
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%SANCTUM HOUSE: $500 → 8%SANCTUM HOUSE: $500 → 8%SANCTUM HOUSE: $250 → 8%SANCTUM HOUSE: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Anderson Bluhm Freedom Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 82%.

Anderson Bluhm Freedom Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51k · 11 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$51k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+4%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +9%
  • CO
    CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +44%
  • SH
    SANCTUM HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • OS
    OAKLAND SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +4%
  • FH
    FALLEN HEROES MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • DI
    DETROIT IRELAND BOXING EXCHANGE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant House Michigan

Covenant house michigan is a sanctuary for homeless and at-risk young people, ages 18-24 who have nowhere to go. it is our mission to serve these children with respect and love.covenant house michigan builds bridges to hope for young…

Human Services
2
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
3
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
4
Safe Harbor Ohio Inc

Ohio is now home to safe harbor, a faith-based, long-term, residential, therapeutic community for girls, ages 14 through 18, who are survivors of sex trafficking and sexual exploitation. safe harbor provides trauma-informed, holistic care…

Human Services
5
Ranch Hands Rescue

To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.

Animals
6
Bonita House Inc

To empower people living with mental health and co-occurring substance use challenges to achieve recovery, self-sufficiency, and deeply connected, meaningful lives within their communities.we do this by: delivering culturally responsive…

—
7
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
8
City Help Inc of Phoenix

Our mission is to reach in and mine the incredible potential we believe lies within the lives of at-risk youth, the homeless, and needy families of our community by restoring hope and allowing them to dream again.

Human Services
9
3STRANDS Global Foundation

The mission of 3strands global foundation is to mobilize communities to combat human trafficking through prevention education and reintegration programs. we believe prevention changes everything. 3strands global foundation provides…

Employment
10
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
11
Shared Hope International

Shared hope international exists to rescue and restore women and children in crisis. we are leaders in a worldwide effort to prevent and eradicate sex trafficking and slavery through education and public awareness.

Human Services
12
Haven Inc

To empower survivors to heal and engage all individuals and communities to address and prevent sexual assault and intimate partner violence

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Centers of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIRK IN THE HILLS CHURCH: $20,090 · OtherKIRK IN THE HILLS CHURCHBRIDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $10,000 · OtherBRIDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH INCHOPE HOUSE: $1,750 · OtherMICHIGAN ABOLITIONIST PROJECT: $1,400 · Other+9 more: $6,725 · Other+9 moreLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $7,000 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE …SANCTUM HOUSE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSANCTUM HOUSE INCFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,050 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Bo…CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $4,750 · Crime & LegalCAREHOUSE…OAKLAND SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,900 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR SELF LEADERSHIP: $250 · EducationTHE CULTURE HOUSE INC: $500 · Arts & CultureOAKLAND HOPE: $250 · Food & NutritionPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $100 · Health
Other$39,965Human Services$10,550Crime & Legal$4,750Education$2,150Arts & Culture$500Food & Nutrition$250Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $4,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUM HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOAKLAND SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,900 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMICHIGAN ABOLITIONIST PROJECT: $1,400 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CULTURE HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAKLAND HOPE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SELF LEADERSHIP: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUM HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN ABOLITIONIST PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds THE CULTURE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND HOPE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SELF LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anderson Bluhm Freedom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anderson Bluhm Freedom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anderson Bluhm Freedom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph