Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Anderson Bluhm Freedom Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$15kReligion$14kInternational$11kFood & Nutrition$5kCrime & Legal$5kYouth Development$2kEducation$2kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$145k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIRK IN THE HILLS CHURCH$8,140
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$2,000
CARE HOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY$1,000
BRIDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH$500
SANCTUM HOUSE$250
CHURCH WORLD SERVICE CROP$75
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%SANCTUM HOUSE: $500 → 8%SANCTUM HOUSE: $500 → 8%SANCTUM HOUSE: $250 → 8%SANCTUM HOUSE: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Anderson Bluhm Freedom Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 82% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Anderson Bluhm Freedom Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$51k · 11 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$51k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+4%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +9%
  • CO
    CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +52%
  • SH
    SANCTUM HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • OS
    OAKLAND SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +4%
  • FH
    FALLEN HEROES MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • DI
    DETROIT IRELAND BOXING EXCHANGE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant House Michigan

Covenant house michigan is a sanctuary for homeless and at-risk young people, ages 18-24 who have nowhere to go. it is our mission to serve these children with respect and love.covenant house michigan builds bridges to hope for young…

Human Services
2
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
3
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
4
Safe Harbor Ohio Inc

Ohio is now home to safe harbor, a faith-based, long-term, residential, therapeutic community for girls, ages 14 through 18, who are survivors of sex trafficking and sexual exploitation. safe harbor provides trauma-informed, holistic care…

Human Services
5
Ranch Hands Rescue

To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.

Animals
6
Bonita House Inc

To empower people living with mental health and co-occurring substance use challenges to achieve recovery, self-sufficiency, and deeply connected, meaningful lives within their communities.we do this by: delivering culturally responsive…

7
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
8
City Help Inc of Phoenix

Our mission is to reach in and mine the incredible potential we believe lies within the lives of at-risk youth, the homeless, and needy families of our community by restoring hope and allowing them to dream again.

Human Services
9
3STRANDS Global Foundation

The mission of 3strands global foundation is to mobilize communities to combat human trafficking through prevention education and reintegration programs. we believe prevention changes everything. 3strands global foundation provides…

Employment
10
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
11
Shared Hope International

Shared hope international exists to rescue and restore women and children in crisis. we are leaders in a worldwide effort to prevent and eradicate sex trafficking and slavery through education and public awareness.

Human Services
12
Haven Inc

To empower survivors to heal and engage all individuals and communities to address and prevent sexual assault and intimate partner violence

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Centers of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KIRK IN THE HILLS CHURCH — $20,090 · OtherKIRK IN THE HILLS CHURCHBRIDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH INC — $10,000 · OtherBRIDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH INCHOPE HOUSE — $1,750 · OtherMICHIGAN ABOLITIONIST PROJECT — $1,400 · Other+9 more — $6,725 · Other+9 moreLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $7,000 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE …SANCTUM HOUSE INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesSANCTUM HOUSE INCFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,050 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Bo…CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC — $4,750 · Crime & LegalCAREHOUSE…OAKLAND SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,900 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR SELF LEADERSHIP — $250 · EducationTHE CULTURE HOUSE INC — $500 · Arts & CultureOAKLAND HOPE — $250 · Food & NutritionPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $100 · Health
Other$39,965Human Services$10,550Crime & Legal$4,750Education$2,150Arts & Culture$500Food & Nutrition$250Health$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC — $4,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUM HOUSE INC — $2,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOAKLAND SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,900 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMICHIGAN ABOLITIONIST PROJECT — $1,400 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CULTURE HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAKLAND HOPE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SELF LEADERSHIP — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC
  • Who funds SANCTUM HOUSE INC
  • Who funds OAKLAND SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MICHIGAN ABOLITIONIST PROJECT
  • Who funds GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
  • Who funds THE CULTURE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds OAKLAND HOPE
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SELF LEADERSHIP
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anderson Bluhm Freedom Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph