Skip to content

· Public charity

And Justice for All

Increase access to civil legal services for the disadvantaged in utah.

$4.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$12M
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
  • $250k+3 grants · $4.4M
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTAH LEGAL SERVICES$2,032,051
LEGAL AID SOCIETY - SALT LAKE$1,389,127
DISABILITY LAW CENTER$962,837
UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION$20,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$16,000
HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES$12,000
TIMPANOGOS LEGAL CENTER$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION: $22k → 8%TIMPANOGOS LEGAL CENTER: $8k → 8%UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION: $22k → 8%TIMPANOGOS LEGAL CENTER: $8k → 8%UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION: $20k → 8%TIMPANOGOS LEGAL CENTER: $8k → 8%UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION: $20k → 8%TIMPANOGOS LEGAL CENTER: $8k → 8%UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION: $20k → 8%TIMPANOGOS LEGAL CENTER: $8k → 8%UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION: $20k → 8%TIMPANOGOS LEGAL CENTER: $8k → 8%UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION: $20k → 8%HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES: $15k → 8%HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES: $15k → 8%HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES: $15k → 8%HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES: $12k → 8%HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES: $12k → 8%UTAH LEGAL SERVICES: $2.0M → 8%LEGAL AID SOCIETY - SALT LAKE: $1.4M → 8%DISABILITY LAW CENTER: $963k → 8%UTAH LEGAL SERVICES: $926k → 8%UTAH LEGAL SERVICES: $861k → 8%UTAH LEGAL SERVICES: $806k → 8%LEGAL AID SOCIETY - SALT LAKE: $667k → 8%UTAH LEGAL SERVICES: $621k → 8%LEGAL AID SOCIETY - SALT LAKE: $508k → 8%LEGAL AID SOCIETY - SALT LAKE: $496k → 8%LEGAL AID SOCIETY - SALT LAKE: $365k → 8%UTAH LEGAL SERVICES: $316k → 8%UTAH LEGAL SERVICES: $303k → 8%LEGAL AID SOCIETY - SALT LAKE: $280k → 8%DISABILITY LAW CENTER: $227k → 8%LEGAL AID SOCIETY - SALT LAKE: $223k → 8%DISABILITY LAW CENTER: $190k → 8%DISABILITY LAW CENTER: $177k → 8%DISABILITY LAW CENTER: $177k → 8%DISABILITY LAW CENTER: $157k → 8%DISABILITY LAW CENTER: $88k → 8%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $16k → 8%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $16k → 8%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $16k → 8%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $16k → 8%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $16k → 8%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $16k → 8%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $16k → 8%HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES: $18k → 8%HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES: $16k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$12M
$0

Still filing today

89%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UL
    UTAH LEGAL SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.9M · revenue +1%
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +92% · 57% of their budget
  • DL
    DISABILITY LAW CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +14%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    And Justice for All

    Increase access to civil legal services for the disadvantaged in utah.

    Crime & Legal
    2
    Utah Domestic Violence Legal Services

    Utah Homicide Survivors provides holistic legal representation to families of homicide victims.

    Crime & Legal
    3
    Utah Crime Victim Legal Clinic Inc

    Provides free legal representation for victims of crime including providing information, support, and advocacy for victims as they go through the criminal justice process.

    Human Services
    4
    Utah Trial Lawyers Association Inc Aka Utah Association for Justice

    To educate utah trial lawyers and promote professionalism, to uphold and defend the constitutions of the usa and utah.

    —
    5
    Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc

    Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education

    Crime & Legal
    6
    Utah Donor Collaborative

    Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.

    —
    7
    Clean Slate Utah

    To help people clear their criminal records and access opportunities. we will do this by: 1) spreading the word about utah's clean slate law to individuals with records, so they are aware of the law and its positive impact on their lives;…

    Crime & Legal
    8
    Utah State Bar

    To represent lawyers in the State of Utah and Serve the public and the legal profession by promoting justice, professional excellence, civility, ethics, respect for and understanding of the law.

    —
    9
    Texas Legal Services Center Inc

    Texas Legal Services Center is a nonprofit legal aid organization whose mission is to serve the undeserved by making civil justice accessible to every Texan--no matter their ability to earn. We're a coalition of attorneys, paralegals, pro…

    Crime & Legal
    10
    Utah Center for Legal Inclusion

    Advance fairness, opportunity, and inclusion in the legal profession.

    Civil Rights
    11
    Nevada Legal Services Inc

    To ensure equal access to justice for low-income nevadans.

    Crime & Legal
    12
    Community Legal Services

    Community legal services is a non-profit law firm committed to increasing fairness in the civil justice system by advocating, litigating, and educating on behalf of arizonas most underserved communities.

    Crime & Legal
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Legal Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peoples Legal Aid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    7/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    UTAH LEGAL SERVICES INC: $5,865,336 · Crime & LegalUTAH LEGAL SERVICES INCLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKE: $3,929,576 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKEDISABILITY LAW CENTER: $1,977,629 · Crime & LegalDISABILITY LAW CENTER+3 more: $223,000 · Crime & LegalCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH: $111,500 · OtherDNA PEOPLES LEGAL SERVICES INC: $16,900 · OtherHoly Cross Ministries of Utah: $103,000 · Health
    Crime & Legal$11,995,541Other$128,400Health$103,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH LEGAL SERVICES INC: $5,865,336 over 8y, 25% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKE: $3,929,576 over 8y, 57% of budgetDISABILITY LAW CENTER: $1,977,629 over 8y, 24% of budgetUTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION: $144,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetHoly Cross Ministries of Utah: $103,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTIMPANOGOS LEGAL CENTER: $55,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetPeoples Legal Aid: $24,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetDNA PEOPLES LEGAL SERVICES INC: $16,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UTAH LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKE ↗
    • Who funds DISABILITY LAW CENTER ↗
    • Who funds UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION ↗
    • Who funds Holy Cross Ministries of Utah ↗
    • Who funds TIMPANOGOS LEGAL CENTER ↗
    • Who funds Peoples Legal Aid ↗
    • Who funds DNA PEOPLES LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Utah Bar FoundationUT22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Utah Bar Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization And Justice for All funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from And Justice for All. Bigger dots raise more.

    2023
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to And Justice for All?

      Find your warmest path to And Justice for All through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on And Justice for All’s filings →

      More from the funding graph