Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ancona Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$620kEducation$142kSocial Science$28kArts & Culture$25kPhilanthropy$22kFood & Nutrition$7kCommunity Improvement$5kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$750
Median grant
5
States reached
$696k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute$15,000
Amherst Fund$5,200
York College Foundation$5,000
Univ of Chicago Booth School of Bus$5,000
Nantucket Cottage Hospital$5,000
London School of Economics$4,000
Greenwich Academy$1,650
Nantucket Preservation Trust$1,500
Nantucket Atheneum$1,200
Massachusetts General Hospital$1,000
Nantucket Food Fuel Rental Assistan$1,000
Northern Illinois Food Bank$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Nantucket Dreamland Foundation$750
Nantucket Historical Association$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Nantucket Cottage Hospital: $20k → 6%Amherst Fund: $5k → 12%Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $15k → 11%York College Foundation: $5k → 13%American Friends of LSE: $4k → 17%Nantucket Cottage Hospital: $20k → 6%Amherst Fund: $4k → 12%Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $10k → 11%York College Foundation: $5k → 13%American Friends of LSE: $4k → 17%Greenwich Academy: $3k → 9%Nantucket Cottage Hospital: $20k → 6%Amherst Fund: $3k → 12%Massachusetts General Hospital: $500k → 16%Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $10k → 11%York College Foundation: $4k → 13%American Friends of LSE: $4k → 17%Greenwich Academy: $3k → 9%Nantucket Cottage Hospital: $20k → 6%Amherst Fund: $3k → 12%Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $10k → 11%American Friends of LSE: $4k → 17%Greenwich Academy: $2k → 9%Nantucket Cottage Hospital: $20k → 6%Amherst Annual Fund: $2k → 12%Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $10k → 11%American Friends of LSE: $4k → 17%Nantucket Cottage Hospital: $5k → 6%Amherst Fund: $2k → 12%Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $10k → 11%American Friends of LSE: $4k → 17%Nantucket Cottage Hospital: $5k → 6%Amherst Fund: $2k → 12%Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $10k → 11%Nantucket Cottage Hospital: $5k → 6%Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $5k → 11%Nantucket Preservation Trust: $2k → 6%Nantucket Preservation Trust: $2k → 6%Nantucket Atheneum: $2k → 6%Nantucket Preservation Trust: $2k → 6%Univ of Chicago Booth School of Bus: $5k → 14%Univ of Chicago Booth School of Bus: $5k → 14%Univ of Chicago Booth School of Bus: $5k → 14%Univ of Chicago Booth School of Bus: $5k → 14%Univ of Chicago Booth School of Bus: $5k → 14%Univ of Chicago Booth School of Bus: $5k → 14%Univ of Chicago Booth School of Bus: $5k → 14%The Univ of Chicago Booth School of: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$846k · 28 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
8

Total granted

$846k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+21%

Still filing today

68%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +25%
  • University of Chicago
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +56%
  • NP
    NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • AA
    Amherst Annual Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • TS
    The Society for The Relief of Women
    one grant, 2017 · $700
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $400 · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
8
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
9
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
10
National Association of Corporate Directors New England Chapter Inc

The organization promotes high professional standards and provides governance education to boards of directors and senior corporate management.

Philanthropy
11
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenwich Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lake Forest Police Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Massachusetts General Hospital: $501,000 · OtherMassachusetts General HospitalNantucket Cottage Hospital: $115,000 · OtherNantucket Cottage HospitalAmerican Friends of LSE: $24,000 · Other+24 more: $42,370 · Other+24 moreRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $80,000 · EducationRensselaer Polytec…University of Chicago: $40,000 · EducationUniversity of Chic…YORK COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $14,000 · EducationYORK COLLEGE FOUND…GREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $7,400 · Education+2 more: $600 · EducationNANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · Arts & CultureMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC: $750 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $5,750 · Food & NutritionTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF CHICAGO INC: $5,390 · Community ImprovementNMDP FOUNDATION: $1,700 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropyBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,300 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $400 · Health
Other$682,370Education$142,000Arts & Culture$16,000Food & Nutrition$5,750Community Improvement$5,390Philanthropy$3,200Health$1,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $9,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC: $8,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $7,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $5,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF CHICAGO INC: $5,390 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $1,025 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF BOSTON INC: $670 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET GARDEN CLUB INC: $365 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHBROOK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLake Forest Police Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds YORK COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET GARDEN CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NANTUCKET PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHBROOK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN ↗
  • Who funds Lake Forest Police Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Nantucket IncMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ancona Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ancona Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ancona Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph