· Private foundation
Ancetre Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Charity Water | $27,200 |
| Ancient Paths Inc | $8,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,200 |
| Jesus Image Church | $5,000 |
| Many Hopes Inc | $5,000 |
| CPAC Foundation | $5,000 |
| RUN Ministries | $2,000 |
| The Church of Bethesda by the Sea | $1,000 |
| First Things | $1,000 |
| Palm Beach for Christ | $500 |
| Pray in Jesus Name Ministries | $500 |
| ENCY | $465 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 9% of Ancetre Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
CHARITY GLOBAL INC3× · 2017–2024 · $92k · revenue +17%- RUReaching Unreached Nations Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $69k · revenue +117%
- MHMANY HOPES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $64k · revenue +269%
Funded once
- APANCIENT PATHS INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +29%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $2k
- TBTHE BLEXIT FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -88%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
We empower missionaries to multiply churches that form networks among africa's unreached
Training pastors in third world countries
World outreach
Proclaiming the Good News, Uniting the Church, and Impacting Cities Worldwide.
To operatie ministries in africa & south america.
To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…
How this is measured
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds Reaching Unreached Nations Inc ↗
- Who funds MANY HOPES INC ↗
- Who funds ANCIENT PATH ↗
- Who funds ANCIENT PATHS INC ↗
- Who funds NOMI NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE BLEXIT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
- Who funds RAISE THE CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE ON RELIGION AND PUBLIC LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds SEAN FEUCHT MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Ancetre Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ancetre Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Oral Roberts University: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ancetre Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ancetre Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Ancetre’s filings →