· Private foundation
Ananda Fund 009146-000
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $250k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $800k
- $250k+3 grants · $900k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TAPROOT EARTH | $300,000 |
| PROJECT SOUTH FOR THE ELIMINATION | $300,000 |
| HIGHLANDER RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CENTER | $300,000 |
| POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE | $150,000 |
| SISTER SONG INC | $150,000 |
| SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND | $150,000 |
| SPIRITHOUSE SOUTH INC | $150,000 |
| BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
| THE AFIYA CENTER | $50,000 |
| UNITED HOUMA NATION INC | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY MOVEMENT BUILDERS INC | $45,000 |
| TIDES CENTER | $45,000 |
| PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC | $45,000 |
| SOCIAL GOOD FUND | $45,000 |
| SOUTH CAROLINA PROGRESSIVE NETWORK | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TETaproot Earth4× · 2022–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +30%
- BCBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC5× · 2020–2025 · $775k · revenue +11%
- SISISTERSONG INC5× · 2020–2025 · $695k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- PSPROJECT SOUTH INCone grant, 2020 · $275k · revenue -44%
- TRTHE RUCKUS SOCIETYone grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue -95%
Alliance for Global Justice Corpone grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue -25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…
Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…
Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.
Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…
Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…
EFIs mission is to transform the produce industry and the lives of farmworkers by facilitating collaboration among workers, agricultural employers, retail buyers and consumer advocates.
The Black Organizing Project is a Black, member-led community organization working for racial, social, and economic justice through grassroots organizing and community building across the Bay Area.
We elevate and empower people of color in New Hampshire by fostering connections, changing systems, and meeting community needs to make a better Granite State where all belong.
To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.
New georgia project action find is on a mission to increase the civic participation of the new georgia majority and other historically marginalized communities by building grassroots political power in support of progressive leaders,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Louisiana and the most unlike its peers is Pointe-Au-Chien Indian Tribe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Taproot Earth ↗
- Who funds Alternate RootsInc ↗
- Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds SISTERSONG INC ↗
- Who funds POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds THE AFIYA CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds Spirithouse South Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED HOUMA NATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Dallas Local Organizing Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds Community Movement Builders Inc ↗
- Who funds THE RUCKUS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Pointe-Au-Chien Indian Tribe ↗
- Who funds THE HIVE COMMUNITY CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds BLACK LIBERATION FUND ↗
- Who funds FRESH FUTURE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLESTON AREA JUSTICE MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds KIDS RETHINK NEW ORLEANS SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds Sowing Seeds into the Midlands ↗
- Who funds BLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LOWLANDER CENTER ↗
- Who funds SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMBODIMENT INSTITUTE INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Impactassetsinc · New Venture Fund · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Tides Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Women Donors Network · Windward Fund · Tides Center
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ananda Fund 009146-000 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ananda Fund 009146-000?
Find your warmest path to Ananda Fund 009146-000 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.