Skip to content

· Private foundation

Analee Falk Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$129kRecreation & Sports$33kInternational$27kHuman Services$20kArts & Culture$3kHealth$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,080
Median grant
4
States reached
$333k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Washington State Suniversity$10,000
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$8,640
SOW GOOD NOW$2,080
INTERNATIONAL CULTURAL EXCHANGE FOU$2,080
BRANDON BULSWORTH FOUNDATION$1,200
Youthlinc$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YOUTHLINK: $1k → 11%BRANDON BULSWORTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%BRANDON BULSWORTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%BRANDON BULSWORTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%BRANDON BULSWORTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%BRANDON BULSWORTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%BRANDON BULSWORTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%BRANDON BULSWORTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%BRANDON BULSWORTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%BRANDON BULSWORTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
PA
CA
UT
AR
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$191k · 8 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +291% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$191k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+291%
+15%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +42%
  • SG
    SOW GOOD NOW
    6× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +325%
  • LL
    LIFTING LIVES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +291%

Funded once

  • WS
    WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETI
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IC
    INTL CULTURAL EXCHANGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • JA
    Junior Achievement of Utah & Idahograduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +105%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Lindy Infante Foundation
Recreation & Sports
2
Young Athlete Foundation
Youth Development
3
Bearings Bike Shop Inc

The organization's mission is to put the right tools in the hands of youth enabling them to advance their skills to build productive lives.

Human Services
4
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
5
World Learning Inc

Creating a more sustainable, peaceful, and just world through education, development, and exchange since 1932. as both an accredited academic institution and an international ngo, world learning, inc. offers the best of theory and practice…

International
6
Real Salt Lake Foundation
Human Services
7
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
8
Student Impact
—
9
Innovia Foundation

Innovia is a community foundation formed for the benefit of the communities within their region of operation. Innovia seeks to partner with people and other organizations who want to make the world better by addressing our region's…

Philanthropy
10
Slingshot

Helping young people answer the question, "What do I want to do with my life?"At Slingshot, we exist to inspire and coach young people with purposeful direction for work and life. Our coaching framework helps them uncover the industries…

Youth Development
11
Marty Hennessy Inspiring Children Foundation

Mission statement the mission of the foundation is to revolutionize youth development and mental health by empowering children to heal, grow, and thrive through a whole-human approach. using proprietary ten pillars of healing, growth, and…

Health
12
The Rob Walton Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sow Good Now; the most unlike its peers is Allegiant Giving Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,100 · EducationWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI…UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $39,880 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETI: $5,000 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLE…LOGAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · OtherLOGAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONINTL CULTURAL EXCHANGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Other+4 more: $3,250 · OtherSOW GOOD NOW: $32,080 · Youth DevelopmentSOW GOOD NOWLIFTING LIVES: $23,240 · InternationalLIFTING LIVESJunior Achievement of Utah & Idaho: $2,000 · InternationalJunior Achiev…YOUTHLINC: $1,000 · InternationalBRANDON BURLSWORTH FOUNDATION: $19,900 · Human ServicesBRANDON BU…YOUTHLINK: $1,000 · Human ServicesHILINSKI'S HOPE INC: $2,000 · HealthALLEGIANT GIVING CORPORATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWITH LOVE CHARITY INC: $500 · Philanthropy
Education$70,100Other$64,630Youth Development$32,080International$26,240Human Services$20,900Health$2,000Philanthropy$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOW GOOD NOW: $32,080 over 6y, 19% of budgetLIFTING LIVES: $23,240 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetBRANDON BURLSWORTH FOUNDATION: $19,900 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetJunior Achievement of Utah & Idaho: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILINSKI'S HOPE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOUTHLINC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGIANT GIVING CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYOUTHLINK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOW GOOD NOW ↗
  • Who funds LIFTING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds BRANDON BURLSWORTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of Utah & Idaho ↗
  • Who funds HILINSKI'S HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHLINC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGIANT GIVING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHLINK ↗
  • Who funds WITH LOVE CHARITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Analee Falk Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Analee Falk Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Analee Falk Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph