Skip to content

· Private foundation

Amy Heryford Ousley and James Heryford Ousley

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$556k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$278k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$3.1MArts & Culture$9k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k20 grants · $278k
  • $250k+1 grant · $278k
$11,400
Median grant
11
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$278,000
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO$45,600
MONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY$22,800
OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$15,800
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING$11,400
LINFIELD UNIVERSITY$11,400
WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY$11,400
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY$11,400
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$11,400
DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY$11,400
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$11,400
COLLEGE OF IDAHO$11,400
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$11,400
FRANK PHILLIPS COLLEGE$11,400
CARROLL COLLEGE$11,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $11k → 15%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 8%COLLEGE OF IDAHO: $11k → 11%IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $46k → 16%CARROLL COLLEGE: $11k → 9%MONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $23k → 16%SIERRA COLLEGE: $11k → 6%FRANK PHILLIPS COLLEGE: $11k → 12%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 19%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $11k → 11%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $11k → 15%KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $11k → 16%COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 11%DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 9%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $297k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $278k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $264k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $249k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $234k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $233k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $17k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $16k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $15k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $13k → 16%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
ND
IL
OR
NV
WY
PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
TN
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 30 repeat orgs$208k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
14

Total granted

$2.9M
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+25%

Still filing today

37%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $68k · revenue +27%
  • WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +34%
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • US
    UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • TV
    TREASURE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • LC
    Linn-Benton Community College
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
6
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
9
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
10
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
11
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
12
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Willamette University; the most unlike its peers is Lewis & Clark College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1,640,856 · OtherOREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $208,800 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IDAHOWEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $127,800 · Other+33 more: $674,000 · Other+33 moreCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $78,600 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSIT…GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $67,800 · EducationGEORGE FOX UNIVE…WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $42,000 · EducationWILLAMETTE UNIVE…BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $40,200 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSIT…CARROLL COLLEGE: $39,600 · EducationCARROLL COLLEGELEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $37,200 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK CO…The College of Idaho Inc: $32,400 · EducationThe College of I…Linfield University: $32,400 · EducationLinfield Univers…YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $30,600 · EducationYORK COLLEGE OF …QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $19,200 · Education+4 more: $37,400 · Education+4 more
Other$2,651,456Education$457,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $78,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $67,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $40,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL COLLEGE: $39,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $37,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe College of Idaho Inc: $32,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University: $32,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $30,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $19,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $14,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOISE BIBLE COLLEGE INC: $10,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPACIFIC NORTHWEST COLLEGE OF ART: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds Linfield University ↗
  • Who funds YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOISE BIBLE COLLEGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leo Adler TrustIL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leo Adler Trust · West Scholarship Fnd · Walter & Mary a Stastny Charitable Foundation · Eminger Stewart Foundation Uma · Al & Ib Thomas Ed'L Fd · Joann Hamilton Memorial Fund · Wayne C Stewart Foundation Uma · Jefferson Scholarship Fund · The Renaissance Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Amy Heryford Ousley and James Heryford Ousley funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Amy Heryford Ousley and James Heryford Ousley. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Bushnell University Fka Northwest Christian University: 5% of income from government
  • Willamette University: 4% of income from government
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • Corban University: 4% of income from government
  • George Fox University: 3% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Amy Heryford Ousley and James Heryford Ousley’s filings →

More from the funding graph