Skip to content

· Private foundation

Amundson a Tr for Cambridge Fdn

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$211k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2026.

Housing & Shelter$405kEducation$136kRecreation & Sports$84kPublic Benefit$67kArts & Culture$63kEnvironment$63kHuman Services$12kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$150,000
CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION$37,000
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CAMBRIDGE$10,000
CAMBRIDGE DEERFIELD PLAYERS$7,742
CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY LIBRARY$3,100
LONDON COMMUNITY CENTER$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%VILLAGE OF ROCKDALE: $150k → 10%BOY SCOUT TROOP 41: $5k → 12%CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $13k → 9%LONDON COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 20%CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $142k → 10%LONDON COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 20%CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $116k → 10%CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $90k → 10%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES PROGRAM: $54k → 10%CAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%VILLAGE OF CAMBRIDGE: $40k → 10%LAKE RIPLEY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: $40k → 10%CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $37k → 10%CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25k → 10%VILLAGE OF CAMBRIDGE: $23k → 10%VILLAGE OF CAMBRIDGE: $20k → 10%CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%CAMBRIDGE DEERFIELD PLAYERS: $20k → 10%CAMBRIDGE HISTORIC DISTRICT: $19k → 10%CAMBRIDGE AREA RESOURCE TEAM: $18k → 10%LAKE RIPLEY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: $15k → 10%LAKE RIPLEY PARK: $15k → 10%CAMBRIDGE AREA RESOURCE TEAM: $15k → 10%CAMBRIDGE AREA RESOURCE TEAM: $15k → 10%CAMBRIDGE AREA RESOURCE TEAM: $15k → 10%VILLAGE OF CAMBRIDGE: $13k → 10%CAMBRIDGE DEERFIELD PLAYERS: $11k → 10%CAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%VILLAGE OF ROCKDALE: $10k → 10%SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CAMBRIDGE: $10k → 10%CAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES PROGRAM: $10k → 10%CAMBRIDGE ARTS COUNCIL: $8k → 10%LAKE RIPLEY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: $8k → 10%CAMBRIDGE DEERFIELD PLAYERS: $8k → 10%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES PROGRAM: $7k → 10%CAMBRIDGE ARTS COUNCIL: $7k → 10%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES PROGRAM: $6k → 10%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $6k → 10%CAMBRIDGE ARTS COUNCIL: $5k → 10%CAMBRIDGE DEERFIELD PLAYERS: $5k → 10%VILLAGE OF ROCKDALE: $5k → 10%VILLAGE OF ROCKDALE: $4k → 10%TOWN OF OAKLAND: $4k → 10%CAMBRIDGE LIBRARY: $3k → 10%CAMBRIDGE AREA SENIOR RESOURCE NETWORK: $3k → 10%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $3k → 10%UTICA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+17%

Still filing today

38%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2026 · $405k · revenue +237% · 71% of their budget
  • CC
    CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $77k · revenue +8%
  • CH
    CAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIO
    3× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue +690% · 55% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $19k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $15k
  • CP
    CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2025 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $168,865 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $95,660 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAKE RIPLEY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: $63,000 · OtherLAKE RIPLEY MANAGEMENT DISTRICTCAMBRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $35,000 · OtherCAMBRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICTCAMBRIDGE ARTS COUNCIL: $19,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · Other+10 more: $75,150 · Other+10 moreCAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $405,488 · Recreation & SportsCAMBRIDGE FOUNDATIONCAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIO: $70,000 · Arts & CultureCAMBRIDGE H…Cambridge-Deerfield Players Theater: $43,574 · Arts & CultureCambridge-D…CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES PROGRAM INC: $76,922 · Youth DevelopmentCAMBRIDGE AREA RESOURCE TEAM INC: $63,000 · Public Benefit
Other$475,675Recreation & Sports$405,488Arts & Culture$113,574Youth Development$76,922Public Benefit$63,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $405,488 over 5y, 71% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES PROGRAM INC: $76,922 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIO: $70,000 over 3y, 55% of budgetCAMBRIDGE AREA RESOURCE TEAM INC: $63,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetCambridge-Deerfield Players Theater: $43,574 over 4y, 33% of budgetUTICA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE HISTORIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIO ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE AREA RESOURCE TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Cambridge-Deerfield Players Theater ↗
  • Who funds UTICA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Amundson a Tr for Cambridge Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Amundson a Tr for Cambridge Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Amundson a Tr for Cambridge Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph